| “Anonymous”-This was an unusual choice for director Roland Emmerich, usually known for disaster thrillers such as “2012” and “The Day After Tomorrow.” This time he chose to expend his efforts on a speculation about the true authorship of the plays and poems of William Shakespeare, one known as the Oxfordian theory. “Anonymous” begins with a Broadway introduction by the incredibly articulate Derek Jacobi, exposing Shakespeare’s lack of education and experience and the unlikelihood that he could have authored the plays for which he is known. The scene then morphs back to the 16th century and the Elizabethan era. Edward de Vere, Earl of Oxford (Rhys Ifans), is the hostile son-in-law of Elizabeth’s primary advisor, William Cecil (David Thewlis), a man who for fanatic religious reasons despises all of the creative arts, especially plays and poems. Rhys Ifans provides a stunning and, for him, unusual performance as an articulate, brilliant, but weak earl who chooses to have others take credit for his written works of art. While he selects Ben Jonson (Sebastian Armesto) to be the “author,” Jonson is reluctant. As a result, an actor, Will Shakespeare (Rafe Spall), who is accused by Jonson of being able to read but not write, jumps in and takes credit for the works originally described as those of “Anonymous.” But “Anonymous” is also a political history of the Elizabethan era. With Joely Richardson as the young Elizabeth and her mother, Vanessa Redgrave, as the elder queen, the film explores her desires and affairs, and the evil plotting of William Cecil and his son and heir, Robert Cecil (Edward Hogg), to make certain that James of Scotland becomes James I after Elizabeth’s death. The younger Cecil is portrayed as a malicious soul who convinces the queen that the Earl of Essex (Sam Reid) and the Earl of Southampton (Xavier Samuel), who is said to be her own son with her once lover, Oxford, are committing treason by plotting to take the throne for Essex, and should be executed. The significance of this part of the plot is that in real life Shakespeare dedicated some of his works to Southampton. Although not shown in the film, Southampton was a patron of Shakespeare, but the film would have it that the dedications were actually those of Oxford towards his own son. The political plotting is somewhat confusing in “Anonymous” because of two factors. First, the film jumps back and forth in time between the era of the younger Elizabeth and that of the elder. Second, some of the actors playing the important characters are, frankly, a little too similar in appearance. That said, the film is still rather powerful, especially due to the outstanding performances of the brilliant British cast. In addition to those already mentioned, I should note fine performances by Jamie Campbell Bower as the young Oxford (who has a rather erotic scene with the younger Elizabeth) and Trystan Gravelle as the ill-fated Christopher Marlowe (whose murder is attributed in the film to an unlikely source). “Anonymous” presents the Oxfordian theory well. It should be noted that while Mark Twain made it very clear that he did not believe that Shakespeare actually wrote the works attributed to him, presenting a strong case for why Shakespeare's authorship was almost impossible to believe, it appears that most historians continue to stand by Will Shakespeare as the actual author of his plays and poems. B+ (2/11/12) | |