Dave's Top 10 for 2005 and other awards

 

Downfall; Crash; King Kong; Good Night, And Good Luck.; Match Point; Syriana; Best of Youth; Sin City; The Squid and the Whale; Walk the Line

Director: Paul Haggis ("Crash"); Actor: Heath Ledger ("Brokeback Mountain"); Actress: Judi Dench ("Mrs. Henderson Presents"); Supporting Actor: Jeffrey Wright ("Syriana"); Supporting Actress: Michelle Williams ("Brokeback Mountain"); Foreign Film: "Paradise Now"; Original Screenplay: Paul Haggis and Robert Moresco ("Crash"); Adapted Screenplay: Stephen Gaghan ("Syriana"); Cinematography: Emmanuel Lubezki ("The New World"); Original Score: Alexandre Desplat ("Syriana"); Film Editing: Robert Rodriguez ("Sin City").

 


Dave F's 2006 Reviews

Click on the name of a film to be taken to Dave's review of that film

 

 

 Dave's scale is 1 star (*) through 4 stars (****)

Akeelah and the Bee

American Hardcore

Babel

Beauty Academy of Kabul

The Black Dahlia

Borat

The Bridesmaid

Caché

Cars

Casino Royale

Cocaine Cowboys

Come Early Morning

C.S.A.: The Confederate States of America

The Da Vinci Code

The Departed

The Devil Wears Prada

Driving Lessons

Glory Road

Gridiron Gang

Half Nelson

The Heart of the Game

Hollywoodland

Hustle & Flow

Joyeux Noël

Kinky Boots

L'Enfant

Little Children

Little Miss Sunshine

Match Point

Me and You and Everyone We Know

Monster House

Munich

The New World

Off the Black

On a Clear Day

Only Human

Over the Hedge

Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest

The Prestige

The Queen

Scoop

Somersault

Superman Returns

Talladega Nights

10 Items or Less

Thank You for Smoking

The Three Burials of Melquiades Estrada

Time to Leave

Tsotsi

United 93

V for Vendetta

The World's Fastest Indian


 

 

"The Bridesmaid": Film director, Claude Chabrol is considered by many as the "French Hitchcock." His career has spanned nearly fifty years and awarded him countless distinctions, but his films have never gained him recognition in the United States. "The Bridesmaid" is his latest release here in the States (it was made in 2004, but is just gaining release in the U.S., albeit a few screens at a time.). If its accessibility is an indication, success will have to wait a while longer. "The Bridesmaid" is the story of Philippe (Benoit Magimel), a successful, but distant young man. He's a little too wrapped up in his own world to notice his troubled sister (Anna Mihalcaea) and generally messed-up family, let alone the true colors of his oldest sister's bridesmaid (Laura Smet), who develops a very, very unhealthy attachment to the emotionally-vulnerable Philippe. Mix in some unspoken familial undertones and an obsession with a statue (this one's a bit hard to describe) and you have one strange film. Chabrol asks us to get caught up in his film, but how can one when one is trying to run as far away from it as possible? "The Bridesmaid" is a very uncomfortable borefest. * 1/2 (out of) **** (In French with English subtitles).

"Off the Black": Nick Nolte is Ray Cook, a lonely part-time high school umpire who creates a second chance at life when he concocts a scheme to convince his 40th reunion class that he's successful and a good father. The problem is: Cook is just an ordinary working stiff, has serious issues with alcohol and is single and childless. He solves the latter problem when he recruits a disgruntled high school pitcher, whom Cook wronged when he called a 3-2, bases-loaded pitch just "off the black." Meanwhile, the pitcher, Dave Tibbel (Trevor Morgan) and a couple of his teammates are just humiliated enough (the resulting walk cost them the game; never mind personal responsibility) to vandalize Cook's modest home. As part of his retribution, Cook asks Tibbel to pose as his son at the reunion. Feeling sorry for Cook and seeing some parallels with his own life (his father, played by Timothy Hutton, is barely there for him), the young boy agrees. The plot may sound a little creepy, but first-time filmmaker, James Ponsoldt adds just enough charm and empathy to save his small film. Nick Nolte doesn't cover any new personal ground with his performance, but he is quite good at what he does best, while Trevor Morgan (a former child star with a couple dozen credits to his name) is solid as the disaffected pitcher. "Off the Black" can lean a little towards the bleak and depressing, but it's a decent recommendation. *** (out of) ****

"Cocaine Cowboys": If you have an interesting subject, documentaries aren't that easy to screw up. Filmmaker, Billy Corben ("Raw Deal: A Question of Consent") takes on the South Florida cocaine trade that started in the late-70s and flourished into the 80s. He interviews several of the main players, including one faction's primary enforcer, who provides gory details of his crimes. He also talks to a crime reporter; a pilot who flew countless, usually unchecked trips from Miami to Medellin and back, and to a nice-guy club-owner type who had an elaborate operation to supply cocaine to not only the Southeast region of the United States, but also the West Coast. Corben stuffed the snot out of this long, 116 minute documentary, leaving the viewer exhausted but surprisingly uninformed. Corben had a three-hour film, easily, if he bothered to give us enough time to absorb his material. Instead, just as we're going "wow, that's pretty interesting," he's slamming us with another quick-cut factoid. And on the other side of the coin, he dwells too much in some areas and not enough on others. Having said all that, if you're at all fascinated by this topic, this is a very interesting documentary. For those of you out there, I am recommending this film. For the rest, wait for the inevitable late-night appearance on HBO. ** 1/2(out of) ****

"10 Items or Less": is a strange little film starring Morgan Freeman as a past-his-prime actor struggling to find regular work. We're not quite sure who he's playing, except everyone recognizes him as that "actor who worked with Ashley Judd in that film." Well, that actor's latest film offer leads him to a small Los Angeles grocery store, where Freeman seeks research material for a "possible role" (he hasn't decided) as a supermarket manager. Naturally, the store is filled with quirky characters, including Scarlett (Paz Vega), a lively checkout clerk, who ends up chauffeuring the driverless Freeman around L.A. Naturally, funny situations and life-lessons occur. "10 Items or Less" is a likeable film, but it suffers from trying too hard with too little. The film looks like it was made for a few hundred bucks. Freeman and Vega form a nice pair, but it's 82 minutes that should be spent elsewhere. ** (out of) ****

"Casino Royale": Count me among the James Bond fans who expressed disappointment upon learning that blond actor Daniel Craig would be the new Bond. He's blond. That won't work! I'm guessing I'm one of many detractors who now admit that Craig was wonderful choice and that he's the best Agent 007 since Sean Connery. "Casino Royale" was Ian Fleming's first book in the James Bond series and is technically a remake of the 1967 Peter Sellers spoof (though true fans don't count it). Appropriately, the film begins in black-and-white, showing the "origin" of how Bond became a "00," which is extra nice, because we, as the audience are not only starting fresh with a new actor in the Bond role, but the character of James Bond, Agent 007 is new as well. And of course, as with every Bond film, we're treated to an over-the-top introductory chase scene, which, here, serves to show the viewer that Daniel Craig indeed has the chops to be Bond. The central plot of "Casino Royale" has Bond shadowing a known terrorist (played by Simon Abkarian), whose trail leads him to Montenegro and Le Chiffre (Mads Mikkelsen), a major financier for a terrorist organization. Le Chiffre's propensity for gambling is threatening the strength of the terrorists. British Intelligence (M16) bankrolls Bond into a high-stakes poker game, knowing that a Le Chiffre loss at the tables will cripple his terrorism group. The plot seems a little droll, but there's enough action (and sex-appeal, courtesy of Eva Green as Bonds' love-interest) to keep our attention. Craig is excellent (in a bad-ass way) as Bond, while Mikkelsen makes a formidable Bond villain. Martin Campbell, directing his second Bond feature (the first was "Goldeneye") cuts out most of the unnecessary light humor of the recent entries and added back the cool factor, breathing a freshness not seen since the days of Sean Connery. "Casino Royale" isn't the best Bond film, but it gives us a promise that good days are still ahead. *** (out of) ****

"Babel": Two little boys, while testing their father's new rifle, accidentally shoot a woman in a tourist bus in Morocco. The woman and her husband (played by Cate Blanchett and Brad Pitt) are on a vacation as an escape from the trauma of a recent miscarriage. Back home in San Diego, California, their children are under the watchful eye of their nanny, Amelia (Adriana Barraza), who, along with the nanny's nephew, Santiago (Gael Garcia Bernal), and against the wishes of their employer, make an ill-advised trip (the first of a few bad decisions) to Mexico to attend Amelia's son's wedding. Meanwhile, in Toyko, Chieko, a young deaf-mute teenage girl (played by Rinko Kikuchi) is also trying to cope with the unexpected loss of a loved-one: her mother. Her father, whose hunting rifle inadvertently ended up in the hands of the boys responsible for the tourist shooting, is cold and distant and unable to give the fragile girl the love she so desperately needs. As a result, the girl, like Amelia, makes some poor choices. "Babel," like its title suggests, is a film about the effects of language barriers; specifically, the chain reaction when communication breaks down. The film comes to us through the genius of Director Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu ("Amores Perros" and "21 Grams") and his writing partner, Guillermo Arriaga (who also wrote "The Three Burials of Melquiades Estrada"). In my humble opinion, Arriaga is the finest writer working in film, while Inarritu is one of the brightest directors. Together, they created a deeply moving, thoroughly thought-provoking film. "Babel" is long and at times confusing but thankfully the duo (whose working relationship, sadly, is reportedly over) didn't duplicate the wild editing style of their previous effort ("21 Grams"), resulting in a more coherent story. Although most of the actors didn't appear together on screen at the same time, it was a group effort, with the performances feeding off the tension in the screenplay. Brad Pitt was extraordinarily mature, while Rinko Kikuchi, as the deaf-mute child, was amazing. "Babel" certainly wasn't one of the more uplifting films I've watched this year, but it was one of the best. *** 1/2 (out of) **** (In a variety of languages-including Japanese Sign-with English subtitles).

"Borat": Much has been written about Sascha Baron Cohen's various "personalities." Some of us remember his HBO show, "Da Ali G. Show," but these days, he's better known as that Borat guy. To the uninitiated, Cohen, like the late comedian Andy Kaufman, steps into his character and won't let go. His schtick is simple and not original. He preys on the socially-naïve and exposes their ignorance, or worse: their bigotry. For some of us, it just isn't funny. We know there are factions of our society who are less than politically-correct, or in certain circles, will say the wrong thing. Mel Gibson's or "Seinfeld" co-star Michael Richards' recent public implosions are good examples. Should their embarrassments be exploited for a feature-length film? Having said all that, I admit there were more than a few moments of "Borat" (its full title isn't worth the space) that had me laughing, but curiously, since I'd already watched (and didn't particularly enjoy) his Ali G. persona and scenes of this film in various forums, "Borat's" impact had diminished. And then hearing how he obtained footage for his film also left a less-than-positive taste in my mouth. In summary, if you know little about this Borat guy and have a thing for this type of humor, you should find "Borat" very funny. For the rest of us, his act is already too old. ** (out of) ****

"Come Early Morning": In many ways the film "Come Early Morning" is like "The Queen." In that film, the title character is out of touch with the people in her outside world. She only knows one life; she's never really spent time with others outside her societal circle. The difference is, in Lucy's (Ashley Judd) world, its rural Arkansas, not England. Her world, though set in modern times, seems pretty primitive. She drives around in an old pickup truck with a jukebox strapped in the back (no I-Pods in this film). She doesn't own a cellphone; in fact, neither do any of her fellow characters. Her life is pretty straightforward. She works in a construction office by day and drinks at the local watering hole by night. Her binges usually end in a motel room with a stranger (which goes a long way towards explaining why her friends call her "Luce"). In short, she's going nowhere. Lucy's life seems to take a turn when she meets an actual nice guy; someone who isn't interested in sleeping with her and who doesn't want to take advantage of her fragile state. But she pushes him away. This is predictable, but it's handled well and the film's ending does a good job of balancing the good and the bad. "Come Early Morning" was written and directed by actress Joey Lauren Adams ("Chasing Amy") and is set in the town where Adams grew up, using many of the same locations she frequented as a young girl, which gives her film a nice authentic feel. It's also filled with solid performances from veterans such as Diane Ladd, Scott Wilson, and Tim Blake Nelson, along with TV veterans Laura Prepon and Jeffrey Donovan, and of course, Ashley Judd, who is lovely as the sweet, but confused Lucy. "Come Early Morning" is sleepy, likeable and recommended. *** (out of) ****

"American Hardcore": Among its many contributions (such as great films), the decade of the 70s gave us some music that ultimately influenced a lot of what we're listening to today and have been listening to throughout the 80s and 90s. Bands like the Stooges, Ramones and Sex Pistols formed the punk sound, from which sprang the faster, angrier hardcore music. Beginning in the very early 80s, from L.A. to Vancouver to Washington, D.C. to Boston, bands like Minor Threat, Bad Brains (my personal favorite from this genre), Black Flag, D.O.A., Circle Jerks, Millions of Dead Cops, Gang Green, S.S. Decontroller and many others dotted the vast landscape, creating an attitude and an energy that opened the eyes of a lot of young people. Ronald Reagan was disillusioning the youth of the day, who needed something different in their lives. Most followed life's usual pattern; others formed rickety bands that never made it out of the garage, while still others made music that mattered. The movement (for lack of a better word) only lasted until about the mid-80s, but its legacy has resonated in many of today's bands. In fact, the Beastie Boys credit their existence to their worship of Bad Brains, while Nirvana (and in turn, the less-meaningful Foo Fighters) may not have happened without Black Flag. Using concert footage (a lot of it previously unseen) and interviews with many of the scene's architects, documentary filmmaker Paul Rachman and writer Stephen Blush (author of the book upon which this film is based) take their audience back to the musical movement's early 80s origins. I loved the documentary's music and the great anecdotes, but "American Hardcore" only seemed to cover a portion of the period. It's probably safe to conclude that the omission of certain bands was due to a lack of footage or access to their leaders, but their important contributions could've been acknowledged. This is unfortunate, and gives off a feeling of incompleteness. Still, it's a good documentary on a subject that (for me at least) is a heck of a lot more interesting than most of the stuff that's out there. *** (out of) ****

"Only Human": A Palestinian man meets his Jewish fiancé's family for the first time. What could go wrong? A lot - especially if the family is extremely dysfunctional (aren't they all?) and the film is meant to be a screwball comedy. Did I mention that "Only Human" is set in a predominantly Catholic neighborhood in Spain? The husband and wife team of Dominic Harari and Teresa Pelegri wrote and directed this farce, using a lot of physical humor and a keen insight into the prejudices that exist in our society. It pokes fun at death, religion, nymphomaniacs and the people who can't deal with differences. It features a cast of unknown (well, to me) international actors. The biggest name is probably Norma Toledo, who was nominated for a best supporting actress Oscar for the 1988 film, "Gaby: A True Story." "Only Human" works as a classic farce, even if it's sometimes a little too silly for its own good. I caught this film in a theater (it had a blink-and-you'd miss it run this past summer) but it's now available on DVD. I recommend it as a light diversion on a quiet evening. *** (out of) **** (In Spanish, Hebrew, Arabic with English subtitles)

"The Queen": I just don't understand why some people get so caught up in the lives of celebrities. Take Princess Diana, for example. Her accidental death in 1997 (in a car accident, ironically blamed on the media) left millions in mourning. She was just a princess by marriage, not Mother Teresa or Gandhi. But tell that to the people of England. Better yet, tell it to Queen Elizabeth II, who, like me, didn't understand the fuss. "The Queen" deals with the hoopla surrounding the death of Diana, Princess of Wales, and why the British Monarchy did little at first to answer the needy call of its people, desperate for comfort in the aftermath of the tragedy. Director Stephen Frears, after working with one legendary British actress (Dame Judi Dench) in "Mrs. Henderson Presents," finds more success with another: the magnificent Helen Mirren, his choice to play the Queen. Frears, working from a brilliant script by Peter Morgan ("The Last King of Scotland"), has a lot to work with in "The Queen." His film examines the effect of an antiquated monarchy system, the unnecessary intrusion by the paparazzi, a new Prime Minister (Tony Blair, played well by Michael Sheen) and why the people were so crazy about their rags-to-riches Princess. Frears and Morgan are careful about taking sides, but their film is about the Queen and does spend a lot of time giving her perspective on the delicate situation. Her husband, Prince Philip (played with a delicious stuffiness by James Cromwell) doesn't care to hob-knob with the people, and the Queen never really cared for her son Charles' (Alex Jennings) choice of a bride, but she does love her grandchildren William and Harry (barely shown on-screen). We get a nice peek at their lives and a little understanding into their thinking, just as we begin to realize why Princess Diana was so revered. "The Queen" succeeds because it catches us looking - and caring - about what it has to say. And yes, Helen Mirren is amazing as the Queen. *** 1/2 (out of) ****

"Little Children": This somewhat ambiguously-titled film does feature little children in the physical sense, but also adults who are a little too attached to their sense of child. There's the immature former high school jock-turned-failed lawyer, plus the ex-cop, who, while trying to rescue the neighborhood from a registered sex-offender, manages to alienate just about everyone around him, including his family. And then there's the sex-offender who is trying to assimilate back into a society that wants nothing to do with him. "Little Children" centers on Sarah Pierce (Kate Winslet) and Brad Adamson (Patrick Wilson). Sarah is a dissertation short of her doctorate in English Literature, but finds herself stuck in a boring marriage to a man (played by Gregg Edelman) who is too preoccupied with Internet porn to pay attention to the needs of his wife and toddler daughter. Brad is a wannabe lawyer who would rather watch the local skateboarders in action than study for the bar exam he's twice failed. He's a stay-at-home dad to little Aaron (Ty Simpkins) while his wife, Kathy (Jennifer Connelly) manages a successful career making TV documentaries. Less-than-satisfied with their marriages, Sarah and Brad befriend each other at the local playground (the film is set in Massachusetts) and after a period of time as friends, cave into their obvious sexual tension, until their afternoons (during their children's nap-time) is spent in each other's arms. "Little Children" was directed by Todd Field from Tom Perotta's 2004 novel (Field and Perotta also collaborated on the screenplay). Field resisted the urge to mine too closely from his successful directorial debut, "In the Bedroom," choosing instead to infuse his film with several moments of timely humor and a live-action novel feel (also featuring an occasional unwelcome narrator who isn't otherwise connected to the story). Field absolutely nails the suburban soccer mom scene; dotting "Little Children" with plenty of amusing stereotypes, but just enough to make his points. He also finds time to show the brutal side of life, with not only the sex-offender character (played memorably by Jackie Earle Haley of "Bad News Bears" fame), but with the ex-cop-turned-neighborhood advocate (Noah Emmerich), who, unwittingly, becomes uglier than the person he loathes. "Little Children" also features an excellent performance from stage-actress Phyllis Somerville, who plays the sex-offender's mother -- the only person in the world who loves him. She is electric and should receive award consideration for her supporting role. The whole cast is solid. Kate Winslet is outstanding as the frustrated wife, while her love-interest is solidly played by the relative unknown (to me) Patrick Wilson. Unfortunately, the fine actress Jennifer Connelly is almost invisible in an underwritten role. In fact, if I had to nitpick about this otherwise brilliant story, it's that it spends a little too much time on the Sarah and Brad characters and not enough time with some of the secondary players. Field, in an obvious ode to his "master," Stanley Kubrick, fills his film with not-so-subtle metaphors and continuous parallels between different sets of two characters. It makes for an intelligent experience at the movies, one that, if you're not at all put-off by certain themes, is well-worth pursuing. *** 1/2 (out of) ****

"The Prestige": A magic act has three parts: The Pledge, The Turn and The Prestige. The latter is the payoff and for this film, if you're the caring type, it could be rewarding. Rupert Angier (Hugh Jackman) and Alfred Borden (Christian Bale) are apprentice magicians cutting their teeth as "audience stooges" for a veteran stage magician. During one particular performance, Rupert's wife (played by Piper Perabo) "accidentally" drowns when Alfred ties a knot she cannot undo in time to emerge from a water tank. The two men move on with their lives, with Alfred marrying a nice woman (Rebecca Hall) and Rupert taking a lover (Scarlett Johansson), but Rupert cannot forgive Alfred, and the two, now successful magicians, spend an unhealthy amount of time worrying about how the other is able to pull off their tricks. Rupert's obsession leads him to Colorado where Nikola Tesla (David Bowie), himself very familiar with professional rivalries (he has one with Thomas Edison) agrees to build a box that will outdo Alfred's "Transporting Man" trick. "The Prestige" was directed and co-written by Christopher Nolan ("Memento") along with his brother and writing partner, Jonathan. They stage their film much like a magic show. We're the audience and we're asked to be impressed by what we see. And magic, isn't magic because there's always an explanation; a catch, and I tend to spend too much time trying to figure out how they do it (the Pledge and the Turn) to be impressed with the payoff. I found "The Prestige" to be a well-made, but like all films, it asked me to care and since I'm not a fan of magic and I couldn't get behind any of the reprehensible characters, I just couldn't care. This left me with an empty feeling toward the film. I respect its intentions and production values. It was also well-written and well-acted (especially by Christian Bale and Michael Caine as Rupert's right-hand man) but otherwise, I cannot recommend "The Prestige." ** (out of) ****

"Driving Lessons": opens with seventeen year-old Ben Marshall (Rupert Grint) receiving a driving lesson from his overbearing, ultra-conservative mother (played by Laura Linney, complete with an awkward British accent). Ben is a quiet boy with no girlfriend and no idea what he wants to do with his life. Seeking a little relief from his mother and his vicar father, Ben takes a job as an assistant for eccentric stage actress Dame Evie Walton (Julie Walters). Evie is quite the contrast to Ben's mother, but that's the idea. Writer-director, Jeremy Brock, drawing from his own experiences as a teenaged assistant to Dame Peggy Ashcroft, tries his best with "Driving Lessons," but ultimately, his film feels patched together from a series of ideas (including some from "Harold and Maude"). The film was also heavily edited from its original expletive-filled version that played the festival circuit earlier this year. It seems that Grint's appeal (he plays the Ron Weasley character in the Harry Potter films) convinced the producers to cut "Driving Lessons" to a PG-13 rating. Apparently, they also cut the film's soul. Overall, the film still has charm and it benefits from a terrific performance from Julie Walters, but I can't recommend this as anything more than your second or third choice on DVD. ** (out of) ****

"The Departed": Wow. I'll start my review with a superlative. In fact, "Wow" may not be strong enough. "The Departed" is Martin Scorsese's finest film since "Goodfellas," which happens to be one of my all-time favorites. Scorsese's latest is based on the little-seen 2004 Hong Kong thriller "Infernal Affairs." And like that film, the central plot of "The Departed" involves two cops, one a low-level, but ambitious mobster (Matt Damon) infiltrating the Boston State Police and the other (Leonardo DiCaprio), a "Statie" whose criminal family history allows him to successfully go deep into a notorious South Boston Irish gang led by Frank Costello (Jack Nicholson). Based on unusual knowledge of the other's operation, both the state police, led by police chief Joe Queenan (Martin Sheen), and Costello suspect a rat is their midst and spend most of the movie trying to flush him out. Cool plot and an even cooler movie. And best of all? It's all done flawlessly. From the direction to the writing (William Monahan) to the acting - it's all perfect. Yes, perfect. Pass out the Oscars already. Damon and DiCaprio have never been finer. Mark Wahlberg? I didn't know he had it in him. He almost steals this movie - if that's possible considering its star-studded cast (including nice supporting turns from Martin Sheen, Ray Winstone, Alec Baldwin and Anthony Anderson) and of course, Jack. Yes, Jack Nicholson, who gives his best performance since "The Witches of Eastwick" (and he's had a lot of good ones since then). But despite its great cast, this is Scorsese's film. He was already the master of the gangster genre and with "The Departed," he re-confirms it. Yes, his film is bloody and shocking, but it would be less than honest if it wasn't. But his film is also rich with humor and rife with sharp dialogue. It even has a little romance, some great suspense and an appropriate soundtrack. Did I mention it also has a jaw-dropping-middle-finger-to-Hollywood ending that should shock even the most seasoned movie fan? It's truly a complete production. This is what "Gangs of New York" could've and should've been! For filmgoers who like great films, this is bliss. Martin Scorsese is back. Oh, is he ever! **** (out of) ****

"Gridiron Gang": I am a self-admitted movie snob. There are actors I've never watched and genres I rarely give the time of day. Yet, when it comes to the ever-predictable sports movie, I am in line with money in hand. Y'see, this is a film-type that is almost bulletproof (well, unless it involves Burt Reynolds) and the latest, "Gridiron Gang," continues the tradition. Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson stars as Sean Porter, a director at a California juvenile detention camp. Porter is frustrated that his kids are landing right back in his facility - and worse, in hardcore prisons - because the "system" seems to be failing. The former college football stars sees their aggressive energy and decides to channel in the form of a football team. He convinces his superiors and a handful of local coaches to allow his criminal charges to participate in a nearby high school conference. You can figure out the rest. Yes, this film has plenty of clichés, but benefits from likeable performances, especially from Johnson, who, with the right roles in the right movies, could have a good career as a serious actor. "The Gridiron Gang," by the way, is based on an actual true story and comes complete with the real-life footage and where-they-are-now updates during the end credits. Recommended. *** (out of) ****

"The Black Dahlia": The story of the Black Dahlia, if you're not familiar, involves the gruesome (and still unsolved) 1947 murder of aspiring actress Elizabeth Short. As a fan of true crime, I was pretty anxious to see what director Brian De Palma would do with one of Hollywood's most infamous stories. Alas, like the vast majority of De Palma's projects since 1987's "The Untouchables" ("Carlito's Way" being the exception), "The Black Dahlia" is a huge disappointment. In reality, the story of the Black Dahlia is just a subplot for what is really a mess of a film. Director Brian De Palma, he of a handful of good films and a whole of lot of bad, missed yet again with this effort. De Palma, along with writer Josh Friedman ("War of the Worlds"), took James Ellroy's loose pulp novel and loosened it up a lot more, sprinkling dysfunctional characters (portrayed by Aaron Eckhart, Scarlett Johannson and Hilary Swank - all wasting their time) and one very bad performance from the ultra-wooden Josh Hartnett into what is supposed to pass for the Black Dahlia story. Skip it in every conceivable format. * (out of) ****

"Half Nelson": Drey (Shareeka Epps) is a quiet, but sweet young girl with a troubled background. Her father is in prison and her mother struggles to put food on the table. Her male role-model appears to be Frank, the local drug dealer who apparently played a role in Drey's father's incarceration. Drey could certainly use a better role-model in her life. Drey's eighth-grade teacher, Mr. Dunne (Ryan Gosling), notices her struggles. She notices Mr. Dunne, too, except it's while he's smoking crack cocaine in a supposedly vacant school bathroom. She's discreet about her discovery, but it wakes up Dunne just enough to recognize that he's too much of a positive influence upon the young girl to be setting such a bad example, but not enough of a wake-up call to actually kick his "under control" habit. When Dunne is straight, he's a brilliant teacher who captures the imagination of his students at the at-risk Brooklyn, New York junior high school. But when he's not right, he shuts himself in and away from the people who could help him. Dunne is able to keep it together most of the time, but it isn't long before he spirals out of control. "Half Nelson" explores the characters of both Dunne and Drey as they cope with their problems while trying not to lean too hard on the other. The viewer can almost feel their pain and hear their cries. "Half Nelson" is effective because of the convincing performances of its leads. Shareeka Epps is a revelation as Drey, while Ryan Gosling is tremendous as the affable, but disturbing teacher. I barely recognized Gosling from his previous role in the underappreciated "Stay." His chameleon looks and commanding style are reminiscent of another great actor: Sean Penn. I feel Gosling's future is that bright and I look forward to watching his career. "Half Nelson" was directed and co-written by Ryan Fleck (along with his partner, Anna Boden) and developed via the Sundance workshop from the short-film, "Gowanus, Brooklyn" that the pair made in 2004. Their project isn't warm and uplifting, but it has something to say and gives its viewer something to think about it, which is more than can be said for most films. Highly recommended. ***1/2 (out of) ****

"Hollywoodland": is a movie about the life and death of actor George Reeves (Ben Affleck), best known as Superman from the 50's TV show. Reeves died mysteriously (it was ruled a suicide) in 1959 during a time when his star had faded; when the egomaniacal Reeves' life was just a string of personal appearances and the job of 'kept man' for the wife (played by Diane Lane) of a powerful studio honcho. "Hollywoodland" attempts to explore the various reasons for his death, showing all the different scenarios, with private detective Louis Simo (Adrien Brody doing his best Jake Gittes impersonation) chasing down the possibility that Reeves hadn't committed suicide. Good idea? Possibly. But director Allen Coulter (occasional director for "The Sopranos") takes the intriguing concept and bores us to death. His pacing is torturous and the story uninteresting. Ben Affleck was a wise and somewhat ironic choice to plays Reeves (given Affleck's inconsistent career). Brody is also good, but it wasn't enough. I just couldn't get into this movie. Amazingly, there are some who dared to compare "Hollywoodland" to the vastly superior "L.A. Confidential." Settings and tone do not a great film make. Ultimately, "Hollywoodland" is a yawn-fest. ** (out of) ****

"Time to Leave": Writer-director, Francois Ozon has officially graduated to the level of enigma. The bright and undeniably talented filmmaker who gave us the brilliant "Water Drops on Burning Rocks" and "Swimming Pool," plus the interesting "8 Women," missed (in this writer's opinion) with "5x2" and now "Time to Leave," Ozon's ode to the dying man with a few months to live and a lot of making up to do. Melvil Poupaud ("Le Divorce") stars as Romain, a brooding Parisian fashion photography whose world is rocked when he learns he has a terminal disease. Instead of seeking the support of his loved ones, he retreats and even alienates those closest to him. In short, he behaves like a jerk, which makes it difficult to feel sorry for his character, not to mention like the movie. What Ozon feels is a different approach to an old subject backfires when the viewer, like the film's principle subject, lacks compassion for what's around him. Skip it. * 1/2 (out of) **** (In French with English subtitles)

"Little Miss Sunshine": It should've come as no surprise to me that the directors of many innovative 80's and 90's music videos and television commercials were the brains behind the clever and very entertaining independent film, "Little Miss Sunshine." It takes a certain talent to consistently deliver original ideas in those demanding mediums. When it comes to film (which is a difficult jump from video), originality is a rarity, but with "Little Miss Sunshine," the married team of Jonathan Dayton and Valerie Faris, along with first-time writer Michael Arndt, mine a familiar theme (the dysfunctional family) to create a very funny, and ultimately, pretty original film. Motivational speaker Richard Hoover (Greg Kinnear) is one pyramid scheme away from success. His wife Sheryl (Toni Collette) is fairly normal, but her brother Frank (Steve Carell) is on watch after a failed suicide attempt after his gay lover rejected him for his biggest rival. Richard's father (played by Alan Arkin) is a sweet old man with a fondness for snorting heroin, and Richard's Nietzsche-reading teenage son Dwayne (Paul Dano), is in his second year of a self-imposed silence. The glue that holds this crazy family together is sweet six year-old Olive (Abigail Breslin), who, thanks to her enterprising father, is getting her chance at stardom by entering the highly-competitive "Little Miss Sunshine" child pageant. Frank can't be left alone, so he joins the family on their VW bus for a trip to Southern California. As road trip movies go, this is a good one. You have your requisite highway patrolman, and "Vacation" moments, but the filmmakers steer their film along the right road, swerving carefully to avoid the cliché speed-bumps associated with the typical fare. Okay, that was bad, but this film isn't. Its cast, led by the adorable Abigail Breslin and pitch-perfect Greg Kinnear, is near perfect. Save for a few very creepy moments, "Little Miss Sunshine" is a breath of fresh air in an otherwise smoggy environment. *** 1/2 (out of) ****

"Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby": As a young boy, Ricky Bobby (Will Ferrell) seemed destined to be a famous race-car driver. He was just five year-old when he was caught joyriding in his mother's station wagon. He later worked his way up from a pit-crew member to a career as a successful driver on the NASCAR circuit, including all the trappings: beautiful trophy wife (Leslie Bibb); pushy sponsors; a shaky relationship with his best friend (John C. Reilly), and a heated rivalry with a French driver (Sacha Baron Cohen). Okay, the last part isn't very clichéd, but like much of this film, it was funny. Ferrell, along with his writing partner and director, Adam McKay ("Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy") lampoon yet another easy target and turn it into something very funny. I guess it helped that it's a film on NASCAR, but from a Hollywood perspective. As a former Californian now living in the heart of NASCAR-country, I could laugh at the film's oh-so-true stereotypes, like the family dinners at Applebee's or naming your kids (Ricky Bobby's "Walker" and "Texas Ranger") after regional heroes. McKay and Ferrell also mocked (to death) the walking billboard aspect of the sport. I hope the producers were savvy enough to collect fees from the few hundred product placements that deliberately dot this movie. "Talladega" isn't great, but it spreads its laughs out well enough to keep your entertained. It also helped that Ferrell surrounds himself with an excellent cast and clearly isn't afraid to be upstaged. Sacha Baron Cohen ("Borat" and "Ali G") is hysterical as a gay French Formula "un" race-car driver, and John C. Reilly is perfect as Ferrell's sidekick, Cal Naughton, Jr. Will Ferrell doesn't try to reinvent the wheel in his films, but he does take a household concept and make it his own. He was successful with this formula in "Anchorman" and in some of his other efforts, and in "Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby," he's just good enough to keep you laughing. *** (out of) ****

"Scoop": Woody Allen films have become a bit of an annual, even semi-annual tradition. In fact, it's been less than seven months since our senses were treated to the magnificent "Match Point." Woody's classical music; London, England, and actress Scarlett Johansson are back with "Scoop," but that's where the similarities end. Once the viewer gets past that it's not "Match Point," but a throw-back Woody Allen film, the enjoyment can begin. Johansson plays Sondra Pransky, a vacationing journalism student from New York, who meets magician Splendini, aka Sid Waterman (played by Allen, who, naturally, also wrote and directed "Scoop"), while attending one of London shows. Sid selects Sondra out of the audience for his infamous disappearing-girl-in-a-box trick. While in the box, Sondra meets a ghost of a recently-deceased reporter (Ian McShane) who has a tip on the identity of the Tarot Card murderer. Rather than dismiss the ghost, Johansson chases the tip, which implicates Peter Lyman (Hugh Jackman), the very-well-do-to son of a Lord. Sondra recruits Sid (who can also see the ghost), to help her pose as daughter and father in order to gain entry into Lyman's world. Naturally, the beautiful Sondra charms the bachelor Peter, while the awkward and often-embarrassing Sid (in classic Woody form) provides the laughs. The question is: how could the impressive Lyman possibly be a killer? And for that matter, why should anyone trust the word of a ghost? "Scoop" is far from Woody's best and there are definitely moments when a little Woody went a long way. It's saved in part because of Scarlett Johansson and Hugh Jackman's performances. It also helps to look at this film as a bit of a modern-style Forties B-comedy. With that perspective, "Scoop" can be an enjoyable film-going experience. *** (out of) ****

"Monster House": Computer animation has almost become scary-good. Pixar Films rules the landscape, but others are gaining. Sony Picture Imageworks ("The Polar Express," among many others) gives us "Monster House," a fresh take on the old neighbor's haunted house theme. 12 year-old DJ (voiced by Mitchel Musso) and his best friend, Chowder (Sam Lerner) are very intimidated by a particular house in their neighborhood, especially its lawn where stray balls and misguided kites go to die. It's as if the house is…alive. We know young boys can have crazy imaginations, but there may be something to their wild accusations. Boys being, well, boys, investigate their suspicions. "Monster House" doesn't position itself as a cutesy children's film. In fact, it seemed to use animation as a legitimate excuse to further its ambitious ideas outside the limitations of a live-action format. I found similarities with this film and "Stand By Me" and "Sandlot," but only in the inspiration for some of the characters and their attitudes. That aside, it's fairly original and not played for laughs (though there are certainly more than a few). Young filmmaker, Gil Kenen makes an impressive directorial debut, along the lines of Brad Bird and "The Iron Giant," but without that film's heart. The key voices for "Monster House" are provided by unknowns, but its cast is also filled out with the likes of Steve Buschemi (as the cranky owner of the "haunted" house), Maggie Gyllenhaal, Fred Willard and Jason Lee. "Monster House" is too intense for the single-digit-aged crowd, but all others, including, yes, adults, should appreciate this film. *** (out of) ****

"Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest": I believe that movie-going provides different levels of entertainment. You can enjoy one film for its cerebral content just as you can delight in another for its rollicking sense of adventure. One might require a box of tissues and the other a box of popcorn. Needless to say, the Kleenex stayed in the car for this one (ahem, not I need either while watching a film). "Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest" is the sequel to the wildly-successful 2003 film starring Johnny Depp as rogue pirate, Captain Jack Sparrow. Depp is back and so is Keira Knightley, Orlando Bloom, Jack Davenport, Jonathan Pryce, Stellan Skarsgard plus several recognizable character actors, including Bill Nighy as Davy Jones, the legendary figure who covets Captain Jack's soul. The central plot to the sequel involves locating a compass and a key, which will provide a treasure chest containing a secret. Each of the film's principal characters has a direct or indirect purpose for finding the booty. This may sound simple, but with the addition of some nice sword-play and a ton of CGI effects, the filmmakers manage to keep the action going for 2 _ hours. In fact, director Gore Verbinski has now sustained a five-minute amusement park ride for five hours (and counting). That alone is worth an extra half-star. "Dead Man's Chest" is action-packed enough to keep an adventure-film audience's interest, but the Kleenex crowd who snuck into this movie might feel a little out of place amongst all the silliness. Positioning myself in-between and understanding its intent, I liked the film, especially its performances from Johnny Depp (he is such a great actor), Bill Nighy and Stellan Skarsgard. Minor nitpicks aside, the sequel to "Pirates of the Caribbean" is one ride that's worth the wait in line. *** (out of) ****

"The Devil Wears Prada": Anne Hathaway is Andy Sachs, a fresh-out-of-Northwestern wannabe magazine editor. She's been told that if she's able to endure one year as an assistant to the personal assistant for the editor of Runway magazine, Miranda Priestly (Meryl Streep), she can get any job she wants. Andy is a sweet girl with a nice boyfriend (played by Adrian Grenier from "Entourage"), but she's hopelessly out of her league. She's pretending to know fashion but doesn't realize (until all the elitist snobs tell her) that her clothing is, well, so last week. And as the small-town girl trying to make it in the big city (the film is set in Manhattan), she doesn't have a clue how to act. That's the setup for this glorified film version (with a lot less personality) of "Sex and the City." My personal draws to this film, Anne Hathaway and Meryl Streep, didn't disappoint, but like our heroine, Andy, I was way out of my element. So, if you like watching films about the so-called beautiful people, see "The Devil Wears Prada." The only other reasons to recommend the film are the world-class performances from Streep and Stanley Tucci, as one of the employees of her magazine. Otherwise, skip it. ** (out of) ****

"Superman Returns": When is too much, too much? The Superman franchise has been around for nearly 70 years; spanning a comic book, a serial, a couple of TV shows (that I can recall) and a few Christopher Reeve movies, yet the public is still demanding more, or at least Warner Bros. and $260M of their money say so. Buoyed by the success of some recent comic book film adaptations (most notably, the Spiderman franchise), the WB enlisted a veteran director (Bryan Singer, of the "X-Men" series) of that medium to tackle the latest attempt to keep the Man of Steel burned firmly into our consciousness. The end result is "Superman Returns" which does a decent job of updating our aging hero and even finds time to poke fun at itself. The film stars Brandon Routh as newspaper reporter Clark Kent. Clark has just returned from a long leave of absence to his old job at the Daily Planet. Coincidentally, Clark's alter ego, Superman, also reappears to save the world. This provides mixed emotions for Clark's fellow reporter, Lois Lane (Kate Bosworth), who has moved on with her life since Superman left. She has a small child and is in a committed relationship. Heck, she even wrote a Pulitzer Prize-winning article on why the world doesn't need Superman. Ah, but the world does need the Man of Steel. They need him to help foil Lex Luthor (Kevin Spacey), who has a cunning plan to control most of the world's real estate. Despite the best efforts of its cast, this latest installment of Superman suffers from the yawns. As filmgoers, we're spoiled by CGI, and while this film delivers in that area, it's nothing we haven't already seen. The cast is also boring and suffers from comparisons to the Christopher Reeves series. Instead of reinventing themselves, the filmmakers decided to update the interior a little. I also found it a bit ironic that as Hollywood continues to remake itself, the dying newspaper medium is still a part of the Superman/Clark Kent legacy, though I don't recall seeing any typewriters in the offices of the Daily Planet. Having said all that, if you put "Superman Returns" into its proper perspective--140 minutes of entertainment, then it does its job. See this film strictly as escapist fluff, which, these days, is a pretty good reason to get out of the house. ** 1/2 (out of) ****

"Cars": If you've read my reviews for "Toy Story 2," "Finding Nemo," "Monsters, Inc." and "The Incredibles," you know I'm a huge fan of Pixar Films. The Emeryville, CA.-based animation company's latest film is "Cars," a play on the NASCAR craze, featuring, well, nothing but cars. That's right, a film about cars starring cars. There is nary a human being in sight or that for matter, referenced in this film. "Cars" stars Owen Wilson as the voice of Lightning Queen, the latest hotshot on the race-car circuit. Lightning, along with his biggest rivals, Chick Hicks (Michael Keaton) and The King (voiced by NASCAR legend, Richard Petty) is locked in a dead-heat that can only be resolved by a trip to California for one final race that will decide the winner of the Piston Cup. Filmmakers John Lasseter and Joe Ranft could've turned this into the latest version of "It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World" or "The Wacky Races," but they take a different approach by stranding Lightning in the hick town of Radiator Springs (located in Carburetor County), where he's just another car. The sweet, but arrogant Lightning is out of place in a town where the local tow-truck, Mater (get it? Tow-mater?), is the only uh, car, to welcome him. The cute Porsche (voiced by Bonnie Hunt) is turned off, and so is the local mechanic, Doc Hudson (Paul Newman). They both have lessons to teach Lightning, but all the race car cares about is getting to California. What follows are several cute scenes that fit within the context of the story, and a lot of the usual stunning Pixar attention to detail, but the animated film tends to drag (not good if you're sitting with restless children). "Cars" isn't Pixar's best effort (that would be "Toy Story 2" or arguably, "The Incredibles"), but it's still a worthy addition to their very impressive library of animated films. *** (out of) ****

"Over the Hedge": Hollywood has seemingly exhausted all resources for film ideas. They've remade classic films, recycled old television shows, produced sequels and prequels, and made (or discussed making) movies featuring every conceivable superhero that has ever graced the pages of a comic book. They've even given the celluloid treatment to some of our morning comic-page characters (mostly notably, Garfield). So it should come as no surprise that, courtesy of Dreamworks Animation, one of our edgier comic strips (Michael Fry and T. Lewis' "Over the Hedge") has been turned it into the latest way to draw kiddies into the multiplex. In its defense, the filmmakers (Tim Johnson and Karey Kirkpatrick, veterans of "Antz" and "Chicken Run," respectively) took a cute idea and ran with it to a good degree of success. That idea is to take one clever raccoon (RJ, voiced by Bruce Willis) and a group of foraging woods-creatures, including a squirrel, turtle, skunk, and families of possums and porcupines, and turn it into 90 minutes of entertainment. The plot of "Over the Hedge" is fairly simple. RJ, the resourceful raccoon, has managed to destroy Vincent the bear's entire stash of winter goodies. He's given a week to replace the food or (the proverbial slash across the throat) else! RJ's search for junk food leads him to a newly-constructed planned community that happened to be built around a collection of hibernating animals, whose peaceful home now sits behind a humongous hedge that blocks off suburbia, and for RJ--the food that will maintain peace with his upset bear-friend. The garbage-dwelling raccoon is shocked that these loveable creatures somehow survive on a diet of grubs and bark. He hatches a scheme to convert their palettes from berries to fruit pies and from content gatherers to scrounging scavengers. This will also give him the assistance he needs to repay the hungry bear. "Over the Hedge" is a cute and harmless film, with enough edge for the kid-at-heart adult and enough fun for the discriminating youngster in your life. Recommended. *** (out of) ****

"The Heart of the Game": It isn't often that we get a chance to make a living doing what we love. Bill Resler, who was carving out a nice existence as a tax professor, wanted a little more. He always had a passion for the x's and o's of basketball, so when he had an opportunity to coach a girl's high school basketball team (the Roosevelt High Roughriders) in the Seattle area, he jumped at it. Somehow this caught the attention of a first-time filmmaker named Ward Serrill. Serrill and his hand-held camera followed Resler and his girls for seven years, compiling over 200 hours of footage. "The Heart of the Game" is the result. Serrill's camera watches as Resler uses a hunter mentality to motivate his squad. It's also there as personalities emerge from his team, such as Devon, who has troubles far beyond the scope of the typical imagination, and Darnellia, whose talent is amazing, but who can't quite escape her roots. There are plenty of big games and even a somewhat-predictable ending, but it's still an unscripted documentary, so in the back of our minds, we still appreciate the freshness and honesty of the film. Ultimately, "The Heart of the Game" isn't just about girl's basketball, but about competitive team sports and how a diverse collection of players bond together to create something special. It's also about a confident, but loveable coach who instills a fierce warrior-like attitude into his young players. Ward Serrill isn't breaking any new ground with his documentary, but in the end, it's still a nice time at the movies. *** (out of) ****

"The Da Vinci Code": The Louvre's curator has been killed, but despite the horrific nature of the murder, the deceased managed to leave (while dying) a series of seemingly premeditated clues to his killer's identity. Sure. Enter Captain Fache (Jean Reno) of the Paris police force. Thanks to all those crazy clues, Fache suspects Harvard symbology professor Robert Langdon (Tom Hanks), in town for a speaking engagement, is his man. And it also turns out that one of Fache's colleagues, Sophie Neveu (Audrey Tautou), was raised by the dead curator. Sophie, who wants to find the real killer, and Langdon, who just digs this stuff, team up to unravel the mystery behind all those clues left at the murder scene. The clues suggest, among other things, several things that would be blasphemous to the Catholic church; revelations that, if true, would rock a whole lot of beliefs. In short, Robert and Sophie are looking for the Holy Grail and there are a lot of people who would love to stop them. Based on the best-selling novel by Dan Brown, the script for "The Da Vinci Code" was adapted by Akiva Goldsman ("A Beautiful Mind") and the film directed by Ron Howard. The book is 454 pages. The movie is 149 minutes. There are two principle characters and a handful of lesser players. At first blush, one could conclude it would be pretty hard for a book with such intricate detail AND a complicated story to succeed (without serious compromise) within the framework of a two-and-a-half hour film. And with just two major characters, it shouldn't be too hard to develop them while trying to cram all those pages into the film's running time. Correct on the former, wrong on the latter. I confess I didn't read the book, but a borrowed copy sat on my coffee-table for about a month. Ultimately, I decided to skip the book and watch the movie. From all accounts, it should've been the other way around. If I ignore its pedigree, "The Da Vinci Code" is at best, a second-rate thriller with a far-fetched plot. The fact it was made by, and features people near the top of their professions, makes it that much more inexcusable. Oh, and for what it's worth, my negativity towards this film has nothing to do with its controversial theories (they didn't offend me). I just feel "The Da Vinci Code" was boring and forgettable and not remotely close to its hype. *1/2 (out of) ****

"L'Enfant": Called me spoiled, but when I watch a great film by great filmmakers my expectations for their next film are automatically a little higher than normal. And when that next film wins the 2005 Cannes Film Festival Palme d'Or (Golden Palm), those expectations skyrocket. I try to judge each film on its own merits, but it's sometimes hard. There, I've blurted out some of the reasons why I should like the latest film by the brothers Dardenne (Jean-Pierre and Luc), they of the brilliant film, "The Son." Their latest, "L'Enfant" (The Child), doesn't pick up where "The Son" left off, but like that film, it's filled with moral dilemmas. Bruno (Jeremie Renier) is a small-time thief and newly-minted father. His girlfriend Sonia (Deborah Francois) has just given birth to the couple's first son. Nice, eh? Well, considering that Bruno is himself a child (actually, he's in his early-twenties but possesses the maturity level of a teenager) and spends money as fast as he can steal it, his child's future might be better served with another family - which is exactly what Bruno has in mind, only he's not interested in conventional adoption agencies, or in the mother's permission. The picture has been painted and now it's up to Jean-Pierre and Luc (they wrote and directed this film) to convince us to, one: care, and two: buy their ending. It fails on both counts. My recommendation? Skip this film entirely, and look for "Tsotsi," which has similarities to "L'Enfant" but is vastly superior in every way. *1/2 (out of) **** (In French with English subtitles)

"Akeelah and the Bee": Eleven year-old Akeelah Anderson is a bright girl from the tough streets of South Central Los Angeles. Akeelah has a gift: she's an extraordinary speller, but her dysfunctional home life and her desire to fit in at school ("brainiacs" aren't cool) hold her back. Her widowed mother (played by Angela Bassett) has her hands full with a nursing job and a troubled teenage son (who's headed down the gang path) to notice that her youngest also has needs. Akeelah's middle school principal, Mr. Welch (played by 80's semi-icon, Curtis Armstrong), recognizes her ability and encourages her to enter the school spelling bee (which she wins, of course) and then the Los Angeles area bee, which could lead to a place in the National Spelling Bee. When Mr. Welch realizes the competitions will require a coach, he encourages Akeelah to seek out his old college friend, Dr. Joshua Larabee (Laurence Fishburne), who is on sabbatical from his professorship at UCLA. The tough-love professor (who was once a contestant at the NSB) and the street smart (but sweet) girl are an odd mix at first, but eventually they bond as teacher and student and remind each other what's missing in their lives. I was surprised to learn that "Akeelah and the Bee" was NOT based on a true story. Color me a skeptic, as it seems that most of the films I've watched lately seemed derived from someone's fascinating life. However, director Doug Atchison's screenplay for this film did win over 4,249 other entries in an international screenplay competition, so in this case, life imitates art. His film has some of the usual clichés and is a little predictable, but he 'saves' that for the beginning and the middle, leaving us with a fairly-creative last act. But it's the performances that drive Atchison's film. As Akeelah, Keke Palmer is remarkable. The young actress is an extraordinary talent who WILL be heard from again, and probably loudly, providing her career is managed in the right way. She is the best reason to see this very inspirational film, although having a cast that includes Angela Bassett and Laurence Fishburne doesn't hurt. "Akeelah and the Bee" is one of the best films of the young year. *** 1/2 (out of) ****

"Somersault": is one of those little films that stick in your craw. Abbie Cornish is Heidi, an attractive but very child-like sixteen-year-old girl. Heidi isn't getting enough attention from her mother, so she turns to her mother's boyfriend, which proves to be a huge mistake. Heidi, feeling disgraced, runs away to the Australian ski town of Jindabyne, where she hopes to make herself a better person. She manages to find work as a convenience store clerk, but her past proves to be a stumbling block. Add in a handsome rich kid (played by Sam Worthington) with his own set of problems and it's Heidi back to her old ways. "Somersault" is about finding oneself through the school of hard knocks. It's also about how two people can find themselves by finding each other. In short, "Somersault" is a real *find.* First-time writer-director Cate Shortland uses non-distracting camera techniques, striking color schemes and soft music to effect her story. Manipulative? Perhaps, but it caught this viewer. It also helped that Shortland's script was so well-developed (the film was quite a few years in the making). I was also very impressed with her film's star, Abbie Cornish, who gave off a genuine naiveté for her emotionally-immature character. It was a very-nuanced, memorable performance. "Somersault" doesn't cover any new ground, but makes up for it by economically using every scene, even the simplest, and making it count in some way. Call it an effective mood piece that works. "Somersault" swept all 13 nominations at the 2004 Australian Oscars, but is only just getting its U.S. release (albeit on a very limited basis). It's worth a search. ***1/2 (out of) ****

"United 93": For those of you not especially familiar with the story, "United 93" is about a doomed United Airlines flight going from Newark, New Jersey to San Francisco, California on the morning of September 11, 2001, a day no American (or most of the world, for that matter) will ever forget. Among the passengers on board were three men intending to take over the plane and then flying it (it's been concluded) at the Capitol building in Washington, D.C. Like many who eventually decided to watch this film, initially, I didn't WANT to see it, but as an American who wants to know as much as I can about my country's history (and a fan of well-made movies), I had to see this film. It also helped that the reviews were overwhelmingly good and that I loved the filmmaker's (Paul Greengrass) last film, "The Bourne Supremacy." I was also well-aware of his success with another live-action documentary (for lack of a better description) based on tragic circumstances: "Bloody Sunday," so off I went knowing I wasn't likely to forget the experience. What it produced was 111 minutes of roller-coaster emotions, not only from the screen, but at times from me. Already knowing the outcome of the events, I felt like a clairvoyant fly on the wall; able to predict what was going to happen, but helpless to prevent it. I can't think of another film that affected me as much as "United 93." Having said all that, one of the things that makes this film so great is that it's not *trying* to tug at your emotions, whether that's tears or anger, it just happens. It allows the human-being factor to take over, which, if you think about it, is what this film is all about. Greengrass' film depicts not only the unfolding of the action on the doomed flight (in close to real-time), it also shows what was going on in the control rooms as it became increasingly aware to air-traffic controllers (and the U.S. military) that a great terrorist threat was happening not only on United flight 93, but possibly others as well. Two planes had already flown into the World Trade Center and contact was lost with at least two others. But while the air personnel and the military (shown separately) wrestled with what to do about the developing situations, up in the air, the passengers of flight 93 were banding together to force their own solution. Through technology, once word started getting around about the World Trade Center tragedies, it became evident that if the plane were allowed to reach the terrorists' planned destination, more than just the lives of the flight's passengers would be at stake. This is where the film gets heavy and where "United 93" becomes separated from a run-of-the-mill Irwin Allen disaster movie. I would comment on the performances in the film, but I suspect many of the actors (mostly unknown) were behaving instinctively. And not surprisingly, many of the "performances" outside of the doomed flight were from the actual people who were a part of the efforts of that day. We see many of the same National Air Traffic Control Center and U.S. military playing themselves as they valiantly re-enact the tragic events of September 11, 2001. Yet, we never feel any amateurishness, or the least bit ripped-off. These are real people depicting a real event in U.S. history. I was surprised to learn that Ben Sliney, remarkable in this film as the FAA's national operations manager, was actually *the* Ben Sliney. The writer-director of "United 93," Paul Greengrass, doesn't exploit the situation of that day or try to change history; he just shows us the powerful evidence and let's us process it. "United 93" is as good as it gets. **** (out of) ****

"On a Clear Day": Stop me if you've seen this before: man facing a midlife crisis decides to do something crazy that someone his age shouldn't do. Sorry, but I'm not going to stop. No, it's not the "World's Fastest Indian," or the numerous variations to that theme (including several reviewed on this site over the past few years). No, it's "On a Clear Day," and in this case, the movie producers could see Hollywood, not to mention every successful feel-good film released over the past five years in the United Kingdom. The difference with "On a Clear Day," is it's short on laughs and long on family dysfunction. Peter Mullan stars as recently-redundant shipbuilder Frank Redmond. Frank is pushing fifty, has a loving wife (played by the wonderful Brenda Blethyn), and a grown son, Rob (Jamie Sives), from whom he is borderline-estranged. They speak, but they have little to say to one another, in part because Frank still hasn't gotten over the accidental drowning death of Rob's brother. Frank, with nothing but time on his hands and a squashed sense of pride, does what any good unemployed shipbuilder living in Glasgow, Scotland would do: he trains to swim the English Channel. Care to guess how he fares? Films of this genre need an edge to separate themselves from the rest of the herd. This is where "On a Clear Day" fails. Yes, it has a terrific cast (featuring veterans of the Ken Loach/Mike Leigh school of working class films) and a likeable conclusion, but in the end, it just isn't enough. The film was directed by first-timer, Gaby Dellal, and written by Alex Rose. While "On a Clear Day" isn't at all bad in its own right, the well-acquainted filmgoer will suffer from distraction; from the feeling they've seen this somewhere before. I would recommend waiting a while (until it reaches cable) to allow for the memories of its superior predecessors to fade just a little. ** 1/2 (out of) ****

"Thank You for Smoking": Nick Naylor represents the interests of the Big Tobacco companies. In other words - he's a lobbyist. Nick's the guy the cigarette companies use when they need some damage control, which, of course, is all the time. Nick, along with his buddies in the M.O.D. Squad (for Merchants of Death: Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms) sits on panels, appears on talk shows, and, occasionally, delivers bribes to convince the unconvinced that their evil products aren't so evil. Nick, as you might expect, is VERY good at what he does. This catches the attention of investigative reporter Heather Holloway (played by Katie Holmes), who'll do just about anything to get into Nick's head. Aaron Eckhart is no less than brilliant as Nick Naylor, in a role he seemed born to play. Eckhart, perhaps channeling his character from "In the Company of Men," is perfect as the cocky lobbyist. "Thank You for Smoking" is loaded with great character actors playing juicy roles. William H. Macy is wonderful as a mousy politician intent upon bringing down the cigarette companies, and Rob Lowe is excellent as a Hollywood agent keen to the idea of using cigarettes as the new product placement in his client's films. Maria Bello and David Koechner are well-cast as the other parts of the M.O.D. Squad, and Robert Duvall and J.K. Simmons are terrific as slimy tobacco executives. However, having said all that, I made a mistake. Since I watch a lot of independent films, I managed to catch the trailer for "Thank You for Smoking" at least a half-dozen times over the past several weeks, meaning I'd already heard most of its funny jokes more than a few times over. I consider it a mistake because, for me, it resulted in a less-than-satisfactory payoff when I saw the actual film. It has also made writing this review a bit of a struggle. But I did like the film and absolutely loved its juicy premise, as well as its point-of-view; still, I couldn't help but think that its filmmaker (writer-director Jason Reitman) could've added some additional ideas to his still-very-clever script and turned his film into one for the ages instead of one that could probably wait for the director's cut DVD release. Reitman manages to rip a new one into several groups, but I still wanted some "new" jokes. But perhaps that's because I ignored the merits of waiting to walk into the screening until just AFTER the previews. *** (out of) ****

"Kinky Boots": Charlie Price (Joel Edgerton) has some pretty big shoes to fill. His father, the beloved owner of the family shoe business (started in 1895) has just passed away, leaving the factory to Charlie, who is fresh out of business school and not sure if he wants to keep the company in the family. You see, all is not well at Price Shoes. Sales are down and Charlie's father left him with a lot of unwanted inventory, plus a lot of long-time, dedicated employees who know nothing but how to make quality men's footwear. Should he sell, or change the business model? Enter "Lola," a transvestite and club performer (played by Chiwetel Ejiofor). Like Charlie, Lola has spent his life trying to fit into someone else's idea of the world. And now, after their chance meeting, perhaps the two can help each other to find their destiny. The film's title, "Kinky Boots," should give you an idea of the company's new direction. The company is based in the shoe factory town of Northampton, England, and like some other recent British favorites ("The Full Monty," "Calendar Girls") this film has a basis in reality. In fact, its factory scenes take place on site at the real company's facilities. "Kinky Boots" was directed by British TV director Julian Jarrold from a script by vets Tim Firth and Geoff Deane. Their film thrives on the performance of its actors. Joel Edgerton, as the sweet but naïve heir to the family business, is effective as Charlie, while Chiwetel Ejiofor (best known for "Dirty Pretty Things") finds a new gear as the flamboyant transvestite, Lola. But my favorite performance came from British character actor Nick Frost ("Shaun of the Dead"), who steals every scene he's in. Aside from its boy meets boy/girl story (which isn't as it appears), "Kinky Boots" follows a traditional formula. The film is a little predictable, but filled with charming characters and a satisfying conclusion. *** (out of) ****

"V for Vendetta": is a film of masks, both literally and figuratively. There are masks that we, as a society, wear everyday. We know we have to act and think a certain way, or face chaos, while a part of us sometimes wonders what would happen if we questioned the very authority that led us to that first belief. *Would* it result in chaos, or could a change to the authority lead to a new order and in turn, a better world? At its core, "V for Vendetta" would seem to advocate terrorism. Its "hero" wants to destroy England in order to make it new. How should we, as an audience, whose indoctrinated beliefs are to repel such acts, react? But it's mostly a work of fiction; of the inspired imagination of Alan Moore. Are we allowed to fantasize about a different reality or would that be too unsafe? If you're actually pondering my questions, then you'll love "V for Vendetta," which may be the most dangerous, yet vital, film to come along in many a moon. The fact that it's displayed on 3,300 multiplexed screens and shown after eight (yes, eight; I counted) previews for various action-themed Hollywood sequels and remakes, blurs its message. Yes, it's still just a movie, but does it have to be associated with typical Hollywood garbage? This is a film that deserves to stand alone from the pack. But I digress.

"V for Vendetta" stars Natalie Portman as Evey Hammond, a mailroom clerk, whose present masks a past. Once upon a time, when she was just a little girl, her rebels-with-a-cause parents questioned the wrong authority and were taken away, leaving Evey to fend for herself in an increasingly-scary British society. She grew up while England, along with the world around it, disintegrated. A Hitler-inspired madman (Adam Sutler, played by John Hurt) has seized control of the country, its media, and the minds of its people. There are mandatory curfews, few civil rights, and secret police upon the citizenry; in short, a totalitarian state. And if anyone dares to question Sutler's methods, they are, well, silenced. There is one such man; a mysterious stranger in a Guy Fawkes mask (if you want to know more about what inspired this movie, Google or Wikipedia that name), who comes to the rescue of Evey, who, one night just after curfew, is accosted by an "amorous" group of secret police. Evey is co-blamed for the ensuing crimes, and the stranger (played by Hugo Weaving), known only as "V," takes the new fugitive into his secret world. Evey has seen what happens to those who dare question authority. Should she follow this man who wants to harm her country, or should she run? And who is the real madman? "V for Vendetta" is based upon Alan Moore's 1980s graphic novel, which, in turn, was inspired by the events of November 5, 1605. Moore chose to disassociate himself from this production, which is curious, because his message seems intact. I credit the Brothers Wachowski (Andy and Larry) of "The Matrix" fame, for resisting the urge to add too many celluloid touches to the story. The violence is sometimes irresponsible and its message, especially in this day and age, is dangerous (let's hope November 5th is quiet around the world, especially in England), but they were unafraid to deliver it. "V for Vendetta" was directed by long-time assistant director James McTeigue, who corrals the volatile story (scripted by the Wachowskis) and coaxes an effective performance (despite her inconsistent British accent) from Natalie Portman, as well as nice turns from his supporting cast, including Hugo Weaving, Stephen Rea and Stephen Fry. There is a quote in this movie: "People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people." Makes you think, doesn't it? *** 1/2 (out of) ****

"C.S.A.: The Confederate States of America": Oh, where do I begin? The thought of sitting through a bone-dry mockumentary about what would've happened to our world if the South had won the Civil War leaves me half-cold. On the one hand, as a transplanted Southerner (originally from Callyfornya), it's a pretty amusing premise. But on the other, do I really want to watch the depiction of modern slavery? I know, I know, it's all in context. Kevin Willmott, whom I just learned is also a film professor at the University of Kansas, is the brains behind "C.S.A." He toys with the idea of a fake British television network (the British Broadcasting Service) producing a documentary about Americans to be shown on American television, complete with commercials of racist products that actually existed at one time, but in this made-up world, are still around. Lincoln goes into hiding; Jefferson Davis becomes president of the newly-named C.S.A., and rich slave-owners seek reparations from Canada when their slaves flee to that country. And later, since our country's leaders aren't practicing tolerance, we also embrace Hitler's principles. To his credit, Willmott's film has some clever ideas and provoked a few awkward laughs, but it was hard to find humor in the overall concept. Just a little over-the-top for me. ** (out of) ****

"Beauty Academy of Kabul": Americans live in a free society where we can get in our cars, drive to our stores, vote in elections; get haircuts. In short, we have freedoms, many of which we take for granted. In other societies, especially repressed ones, there are few freedoms. And speaking of haircuts and repressed societies, American documentary filmmaker Liz Mermin took an all-female film crew and some hairdressers to Kabul, Afghanistan to show us what it's like for working women in that dangerous part of our world. These are women who walk around with burkas to hide their faces, who would seem to have little use for makeup or fancy hairstyles. What Mermin shows us, however, is that the need to feel good about oneself is universal. And this is what grabs us, as the idea of watching a film about haircuts, is, well, just a tad bit more exciting than watching paint dry or grass grow. This is not to say that feeling beautiful doesn't get old, too, but Mermin supplements her documentary with a little background about how Kabul became Kabul, or more specifically, why women are treated like second-class citizens. Her film debuted at the Tribeca film festival in May 2004, but is now just getting a limited release in the States. I hesitate to recommend it because I was more than a little put-off by its arrogance towards the Afghani women (I guess the American way is the only way, eh?), but if you're interested in the customs of other societies, it's worth a look if it ever makes it to the IFC Channel. ** (out of) **** (In English and Persian with English subtitles, when necessary)

"The Three Burials of Melquiades Estrada": We live in a society that tries to teach us to root for the good guys and jeer the bad guys. The difference is, who's good and who's bad? In the case of immigration, are these "illegal aliens" trying to take advantage of our government or are they just trying to seek the best life for their families? Should we root for the border patrol to catch them? Should we not feel sorry if there's a casualty or two among these "illegal aliens"? That's the question, as well as the criticism of Tommy Lee Jones' film, "The Three Burials of Melquiades Estrada." Pete Perkins (Tommy Lee Jones) runs a cattle operation in a small town in Texas near the border to Mexico. One of his best "cowboys" is an undocumented worker from over the border. His name is Melquiades Estrada (Julio Cesar Cedillo). Estrada has a great work ethic and is also unafraid to act like a regular guy. This impresses Perkins, who values Estrada and looks past the "technicalities" of their working arrangement. I don't think I'm giving too much away when I say that Estrada dies. I'll spare you the details, except to say that the person responsible, a border patrol agent named Mike Norton (Barry Pepper), has to face the vengeful wrath of Estrada's employer. It's the last part that shapes much of Jones' film, but it also has so much more. This film has the feel of an old-time western mixed together with the wisdom of a fable. It shines in part through its performances from Jones, Cedillo, Pepper, as well as Melissa Leo, January Jones and Dwight Yoakam, but the real star here is the film's writer, Guillermo Arriaga. Arriaga, best known for his work with director Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu ("Amores Perros" and "21 Grams"), channels the best of Krzysztof Kieslowski and his writing partner Krzysztof Piesiewicz, through the brilliant script of "The Three Burials…" Arriaga's storylines are thought-provoking and his characters are full of depth. Tommy Lee Jones' theatrical directorial debut is as self-assured as his character's performance. His Pete Perkins is a good man who values relationships and only knows how to do the right thing, even if it means going against the "good guys." "The Three Burials of Melquiades Estrada" is a marvelous film. *** 1/2 (out of) ****

"Joyeux Noël": 'Thou shall not kill' is one of the principle commandments, yet the one that seems to be broken most often, sometimes directly or indirectly by those who hold them to heart. Yet, sometimes, even during war, there's time for reflection. "Joyeux Noël" ("Merry Christmas") is based on the "Christmas Truce" that took place on December 24, 1914, during a World War One skirmish between the French, Scots and Germans. For one day the three sides put aside their differences in the spirit of the day they each celebrated. It was deep in the trenches (reminiscent of "Paths of Glory") that the Germans broke out their version of "Silent Night," followed by the Scots joining on the bagpipe (let's not wonder why they brought it along for battle), followed slowly by the French. Cheesy? A little, but I bought it, probably because I'm a sucker for a good anti-war message. Three sides (each led by fierce, uncaring career military men) recognizing their common humanity, if only for about 24 hours; yeah, that works. This Oscar-nominee (for Best Foreign Film) drags a lot, isn't especially plausible (even though it's based on an actual event), but is just entertaining enough (and not too heavy-handed) for a recommendation. *** (out of) **** (In French, German, Latin with English subtitles)

"Tsotsi": Years ago, movie studios used sensationalism to entice potential customers. "Warning: this movie may cause nausea. Not for the faint of heart," and so on. I can recall a sign attached to the fairly recent movie, "Thirteen," advising me that the film contained situations that may disagree with my value system. I was warned, and I will warn you, about "Tsotsi," the South African entry for the Best Foreign Film Oscar. It was suggested that I not give up on the film; that the violence in its first twenty or so minutes may make me want to walk out. I was asked to stay with the film and that's what I'm asking you. Its payoff is worth it. "Tsotsi," which roughly translates to 'thug' in the local street vernacular of its Johannesburg setting, is the name of the unofficial leader of a gang that roams the streets, who uses unrelenting violence to get what it wants. Tsotsi (Presley Chweneyagae) is expressionless and unremorseful when he robs, steals and perpetrates his crimes. He doesn't know any other way. We learn to loathe him and his cohorts, who also seem to cower in fear of him. This is a young man whose scary example instills fear into everyone with whom he comes in contact. We're not quite sure why, but we soon understand. It's during a violent carjacking that we learn that Tsotsi has actual vulnerabilities. I would prefer to not explain what happens, but it's safe to say the transformation that occurs is remarkable, yet genuine and not contrived. I cannot recall viewing another film that so freely drew my personal ire towards a character, yet about an hour or so later, moved to tears of sympathy for that same person. To draw such an emotional shift just isn't done, especially from a complete amateur actor. Presley Chweneyagae was plucked off the same streets for this film. His performance is unforgettable. "Tsotsi," which was written and directed by Gavin Hood, is a film about redemption; about coming to terms with your past, even when it's so horribly repressed. It's also a statement about apartheid and the AIDS crisis in Africa, and the effects both issues have on the young. Hood, working from an adaptation of playwright Athol Fugard's novel, uses sparse, yet appropriate lighting to depict the contrast between the bleakness and beauty of its setting. Powerful as a description of this film is almost a disservice; it's that good and that important. **** (out of) **** (In a variety of African dialects with English subtitles)

"Caché": The English title of this film is "Hidden," as in hidden camera, and given the uncertainty of our government's potential intrusion into our lives, it couldn't be timelier. The film is set in modern France, where TV personality (he hosts a book review discussion show) Georges Laurent (Daniel Auteuil) lives with his wife, Anne (Juliette Binoche), and 12 year-old son, Pierrot (Lester Makedonsky). Their normal lives are forever transformed one day when a videotape depicting a continuous loop of the front of their townhouse arrives to their home wrapped in a heinous child-style drawing. The tape is followed by others and the drawing is eventually copied to postcards. The mysterious, wordless "threats" lead to a lot of paranoia from the very private Georges who's thought to have nothing to hide from his trusting wife. Or does he? There is a person in Georges' past, but if it can be proven it wasn't him, then who's making the tapes? Who's trying to ruin a family's life? "Caché" was written and directed by Austrian filmmaker, Michael Haneke, who, for this film, lost his third Golden Palm at Cannes, but did win (very deservedly) as best director. Haneke's film is a very contemplative look at our society and isn't like any American film you'll likely ever see. Well, I take that back. I can see Hollywood taking this idea (with, say, Harrison Ford in the lead), but changing its ending. I could give you an idea of the style of "Caché's" ending, but that would spoil the mystery. I went into the screening of this film knowing next to nothing about its subject, and left knowing just a little more, but filled with a few conclusions and at least one paranoia. But then again, that was the intention of its filmmaker. ***1/2 (out of) **** (In French with *white* [boo, hiss] subtitles)

"The World's Fastest Indian": "Live to ride; ride to live." That saying applies nicely to motorcycle enthusiast Burt Munro (Anthony Hopkins). Burt doesn't just love his prized 1920 Indian (bought brand new); he's also set up his room in a garage that houses the bike. He dreams of the day he can break the record for fastest man on earth. This is a pretty lofty goal considering Burt is in his mid-60s and Utah's Bonneville Salt Flats (where an annual motorcycle race is held) is thousands of miles away from his Invercargill, New Zealand home. You know where this is going to lead, of course, especially if you're familiar with Burt's story (yes, it's true), or writer-director Roger Donaldson's 1971 documentary, "Offerings to the God of Speed" (also the name of a shelf in Burt's workshop). "The World's Fastest Indian" succeeds in its simple story, benefiting from a very sweet performance by Hannibal, er, Anthony Hopkins, who, once again, proves he can fall out of bed and still act. "The World's Fastest Indian" is a very loveable, very inspiring family-oriented film. ***1/2 (out of) ****

"Glory Road": The who-will-win-the-big-game is one of Hollywood's oldest clichés, but if you're a dedicated sports fan or a sucker for a well-made movie (I'm both), it will hard to resist "Glory Road," the latest film in the comeback sports-story genre. "Glory Road" takes place in El Paso, Texas in the mid-60s where high school basketball coach Don Haskins (Josh Lucas) has just taken a job as head basketball coach for Texas Western University (later UTEP). It's a program in need of a big change. Haskins, operating with a limited number of scholarships, makes the decision to recruit in the inner-city playgrounds. The result is a team comprised largely of black players, highly unusual during that time. The players are very fundamentally unsound, which creates problems initially, but eventually, enormous success, taking on, and beating nearly all comers, including Adolph Rupp's legendary Kentucky team (starring future NBA coach Pat Riley) in a match-up that started five black players for Texas Western, at the time completely unheard of. It would be easy to exploit the various clichés associated with this type of story, but to director James Gartner's (working from a script by Christopher Cleveland and Bettina Gilois) credit, he manages to avoid most of them; keeping what applies to the story he's trying to tell. "Glory Road," with the help of a solid performance by Josh Lucas, is an entertaining film about an important subject. *** (out of) ****

 "Match Point": begins with a little tennis lesson. Sometimes an entire match can turn on the direction of one ball that hits the top of the net. For Chris Wilton (Jonathan Rys-Meyers), a former tennis pro-turned-instructor, that one ball always seems to land on the favorable side. And while giving a lesson to spoiled rich-kid, Tom Hewett (Matthew Goode), "born lucky" Chris catches another break. He's made a positive impression upon the well-connected Tom, and it's just his luck that Tom has a beautiful and very eligible sister (Chloe, played by Emily Mortimer), and that Tom and Chloe's family is loaded and the cream of British society. Not bad for a kid from the poor streets of Ireland. It isn't long before the fish-out-of-water tennis pro is part of the family and a key employee in "one of" his father-in-law's successful businesses. Life is good for Chris, well, unless you count Tom's sexy American fiancée, Nola (Scarlett Johansson), whose charms threaten Chris' new marriage, not to mention just about everything he has gained since meeting the Hewett family. Chris isn't just smitten by Nola, he's downright obsessed. They begin a torrid affair, and, well, then there's the rest of the movie, which takes quite a while to unfold, but when it does, whammo! "Match Point" was written and directed by Woody Allen, yes, Woody Allen. The prolific jack-of-all-trades has just made "the most promising debut by a 40-year veteran" in memory. "Match Point" plays like the vision of some young hotshot writer-director who's been polishing his first project since film school and not a film from someone who's been making us laugh for our entire film-viewing lives. The direction is letter-perfect, from the actors' deliveries to Allen's choice of short, but telling scenes, to his deliberate pacing. And his script is bellisimo! Woody has a pretty good idea that his audience is smart, so he knows he has to be smarter. Just when you think you have an idea what's going on, or what's about to happen, he throws a curveball. Every little detail of this film is close to perfect, from cinematographer Remi Adefarasin's ("Elizabeth") beautiful treatment of London, England, to the lush and very appropriate opera music that fills the air around us. And the performances are excellent. Jonathan Rhys-Meyers ("Bend It Like Beckham") is a star in the making, while the cast around him (including Scarlett Johansson, Matthew Goode, Brian Cox and Penelope Wilton) form a terrific ensemble. Needless to say, I loved nearly every minute of this superb film. I'd like to describe it in greater detail, but the less you know, the better it will be for you. "Match Point" is Woody Allen at the absolute top of his game. **** (out of) ****

 "The New World": is Terrence Malick's fourth film in 32 years. The reclusive writer-director's output may be meager and his style both unique and confounding, but his talent is undeniable. Malick's films could be considered either mesmerizing works of art, or pretentious boredom. Personally, I agree with the former, but I admit too much of the latter has seeped into his last two efforts (including "The Thin Red Line"). Critics complaining the gifted auteur (and former Rhodes Scholar and professor of philosophy at M.I.T.) never met a blade of grass he didn't like, won't change their tune after watching "The New World," but those who know going in that watching a Malick film promises to be a visual and cerebral feast, will not be disappointed. "The New World" stars Colin Farrell as explorer Captain John Smith. Smith and his mutinous attitude arrive at 1607's Jamestown as a prisoner destined for the hangman's noose. His captain (played by (Christopher Plummer), realizing Smith's value to the new prospective colony, releases his young charge, providing he corrects his sentiments. This sequence is almost identical to Sean Penn and Jim Caviezel's characters encounter in "The Thin Red Line." And as with Caviezel's character, the quiet and introspective Smith bonds with the new world's "naturals," only here, there's also the chief's very young daughter (played by 15 year-old newcomer Q'Orianka Kilcher) who takes an interest in the stranger. The daughter, later christened 'Rebecca,' is better known to historians as Pocahontas, though that name is never mentioned in the film. The eventual romance between Smith and the girl is handled with a casualness befitting of the era. Malick delicately and appropriately frames his young subjects as they learn the other's languages and customs, fitting their story around the growing tension between their "people." Something gives and it's the girl, not Smith, who goes to England. "Pocahontas" moves on with her life, eventually marrying another man (John Rolfe, played by Christian Bale), but, as it goes in the movies, she can't quite let go of her first love. The visual beauty of "The New World" nearly engulfs the film. It's as much a story about English settlers/Native American early relations (romantic and otherwise) as it's about the distinct style of its director. I can say with confidence there isn't another American filmmaker quite like Terrence Malick. His films are like poems and their stories rich and deep, with the end result not exactly rousing entertainment. But that's what the movie-going public generally demands, hence why this is about Malick. He lets his camera and poetry-infused philosophies tell the story, eschewing traditional Hollywood methods. This will likely frustrate the audience but delight fans of his work. Not surprisingly, the look of this film is stunning. Malick, working for the first time with cinematographer Emmanuel Lubezki ("Sleepy Hollow") gives "The New World" a gorgeous makeover, using natural light and, well, nature, to accentuate his message. Colin Farrell as the enigmatic Smith, is well-cast, but it's young Q'Orianka Kilcher who shines. Her eyes and expressions (reminiscent of Linda Manz in Malick's "Days of Heaven") do most of the talking in her performance. "The New World" starts slowly, continues slowly, and ends slowly. But if you…slowly…peel away its onion, there's something beautiful to be found inside. *** 1/2 (out of) ****

"Munich": Mahatma Gandhi once famously said: "An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind." Sadly, we live in a world of almost constant Middle East turmoil; one bombing after the other in a never-ending cycle of violence. While the term 'terrorist' probably had earlier origins, it really came to the world's attention during the 1972 summer Olympics in Munich, Germany. Five Palestinian terrorists, seeking freedom for several of their imprisoned soldiers, kidnapped and eventually killed eleven Israeli Olympic athletes. Three of the terrorists were captured alive but released less than two months later when the German government capitulated to their group's demands during the hijacking of a Lufthansa jet. As we know from watching the news every day, retribution bombings happen all the time in the Middle East. But we don't always hear about every one, nor does the media follow-up on the reasons behind the seemingly senseless deaths of innocents. "Inspired by true events," Steven Spielberg, in his latest film, "Munich," attempts to show the world how and why the Israelis avenged the deaths that occurred as a result of the 1972 Munich attack. "Munich" stars Eric Bana as Avner, a reserve soldier with the Israeli army. Consulting with the Israeli intelligence agency, Mossad, Avner is selected by Israel's Prime Minister, Golden Meir (Lynn Cohen) to head up a group whose sole purpose is to find and eliminate those directly or indirectly responsible for the murders of the athletes. Avner assembles a crew of dedicated soldiers (played by Ciaran Hinds, Daniel Craig, Mathieu Kassovitz and Hanns Zischler), each possessing highly-specialized skills necessary for the success of the operation. Steven Spielberg, working from a script co-penned by Tony Kuschner ("Angels in America") and Eric Roth ("The Insider") dots his film with shady characters (played by Geoffrey Rush, Mathieu Amalric and Marie-Josee Croze) and sometimes not-so-subtle political commentary. Spielberg, a proud Jew and filmmaker who has long wanted to make a film in the James Bond series, almost seems to marry those two very separate topics (though this shouldn't be mistaken as a Bond film) in a highly-stylized, but deadly serious version of Spy vs. Spy. There is a scene in this film (which I won't detail) that asks the viewer to choose between 'instant orphanage' and death. Clearly, we're rooting for the former, but *neither* is the correct choice. In a roundabout way of thinking, this describes the heart of the film's conflict. There are no real good guys, just a lot of misguided thinking. However, admittedly, as an American with an Irish heritage, I lack the perspective to make such a blanket statement. Out of the rubble of reasons for the constant fighting, is a need for home. The Palestinians want one to call their own, and the Israelis want to defend theirs. "Munich" is an insightful, if sometimes sensationalized account of a blighted stain in our world's history. But despite its version of the events that occurred after that sad day, the film is a fascinating look at the far-reaching effects of terrorism. ***1/2 (out of) ****

"Me and You and Everyone We Know": "She chose to work under the surname "July" because she says it is the month that most facilitates her creativity." That's the last line in performance artist/short story writer (and now screenwriter and film director) Miranda July's "biography" over at the Internet Movie Database. I'm guessing her best ideas for her clever debut feature, "Me and You and Everyone We Know" occurred during that month. "MYEWK" is, in part, the story of the desire to achieve adulthood, whether you're already an adult or still a child. In addition to writing and directing this film, July also stars as Christine, a performance artist (she uses video as her medium) whose work, appropriately enough, is inspired by the people in her life. One such person is Richard (John Hawkes), whom Christine meets at a shoe store (where Richard works as a salesman). Richard is struggling with the breakup of his marriage, as well as trying to raise his two sons. The two develop the basis for a relationship, but still have to deal with their respective quirks. July fills her film with a series of younger characters, each either a little too wise for their years, or trying to get that way. Therein lie some of the more uncomfortable moments in the film; well, for some. Personally, I chalked it up to just a part of the director's unique vision, but I know some of the film's underlying themes have been a source of controversy to certain groups. Miranda July shines in each of her roles, including the acting one (ironically, she seems to be playing herself, based on her television interviews). John Hawkes (best known as the "nice guy" on HBO's excellent "Deadwood") is wonderful as Richard, the well-meaning shoe salesman. While "Me and You and Everyone We Know" is in part about achieving adulthood, it's also about how one looks at one's life in relation to the lives of those around them. The characters in this film may seem a little "weird" to some, but, to others, they're just beautiful people expressing themselves in their own way. Bravo to Miranda July for sharing her unique vision. *** 1/2 (out of) **** (On DVD).

"Hustle & Flow": A film about a pimp-turned-rap-star? I'll pass, thank you. That was my reaction last summer when "Hustle & Flow" was first released. By the time the strong word-of-mouth reached my way, the film was out of the movie theater circuit. So…I had to wait for its DVD release. I'm glad I did, because in addition to the film, the DVD's extras were excellent and helped set the film into the proper perspective. "Hustle & Flow" is set in Memphis, where DJay (Terrence Howard) lives his day-to-day as a small-time pimp and drug dealer. His "stable" includes the impressionable Nola (Taryn Manning); the vulnerable (and pregnant) Shug (Taraji Henson) and fireball Lexus (Paula Jai Parker), who works out of a strip club for DJay. In-between hustles DJay also peddles his special brand of herb, while wishing for the day he can make something for himself. He doesn't want to end up like his weak-hearted father, who died far too young. DJay, along with an old high school friend (played by Anthony Anderson), a church musician named Shelby (DJ Qualls), and Shug's timely voice, DJay discovers his calling might be music. Together they put together a catchy rap tune they hope will take them out of their present situations. "Hustle & Flow" was written and directed by Craig Brewer (a native of the Memphis area). Brewer's tale is a bit of a twist on the familiar, but he takes a clear love for 70's "blaxploitation" films and instead of usual "evil pimp" storyline of that genre, he shows DJay's human side. Terrence Howard as DJay, is a revelation, and 180 degrees from his character in "Crash." Howard's performance, as well as the rest of the cast, just clicks with Brewer's story. Brewer almost missteps with the film's ending (my initial opinion), but again, when put in proper perspective, it works. Underneath the unattractive theme and tough vernacular lies a very good film. ***1/2 (out of) **** (On DVD).


 

Go to Roy's Movie Page

INDEX to Roy's Movie Pages and Reviews

Return to Roy's World Home Page