Dave's Top 10 for 2004 and other awards

 

Sideways; Million Dollar Baby; Finding Neverland; The Incredibles; The Merchant of Venice; The Bourne Supremacy; Hero; Maria Full of Grace; I'm Not Scared; Kill Bill: Volume 2

Director: Alexander Payne ("Sideways"); Actor: Johnny Depp ("Finding Neverland"); Actress: Hilary Swank ("Million Dollar Baby"); Supporting Actor: Clive Owen ("Closer"); Supporting Actress: Virginia Madsen ("Sideways"); Foreign Film: "Maria Full of Grace;" Original Screenplay: Charlie Kaufman ("Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind"); Adapted Screenplay: Alexander Payne and Jim Taylor ("Sideways"); Cinematography: Christopher Doyle ("Hero"); Jan A.P. Kaczmarek ("Finding Neverland"); Film Editing: Joel Cox ("Million Dollar Baby")

 


Dave F's 2005 Reviews

Click on the name of a film to be taken to Dave's review of that film

 

 

 Dave's scale is 1 star (*) through 4 stars (****)

The Assassination of Richard Nixon

The Aviator

Bad Education

Before Sunset

The Best of Youth

Breakfast on Pluto

Brokeback Mountain

Broken Flowers

Capote

Cinderella Man

The Constant Gardener

Corpse Bride

Crash

Cronicas

Downfall

Elizabethtown

Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room

Festival Express

5x2

Four Brothers

Good Night, and Good Luck.

Heights

A History of Violence

Hotel Rwanda

House of Flying Daggers

The Ice Harvest

In Good Company

The Interpreter

The Island

Jarhead

King Kong

Kiss Kiss, Bang Bang

Kung Fu Hustle

Look At Me

Lord of War

Lords of Dogtown

Mad Hot Ballroom

Madagascar

March of the Penguins

Maria Full of Grace

The Merchant of Venice

Million Dollar Baby

Millions

The Motorcycle Diaries

Mrs. Henderson Presents

Nine Lives

Oldboy

Paradise Now

Proof

Ray

Red Eye

The Return

Sin City

The Squid and the Whale

Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith

Syriana

Undertow

Up and Down

Vera Drake

Walk on Water

Walk the Line

The Wild Parrots of Telegraph Hill

Winter Solstice


 

 

"King Kong": 187 minutes plus another 15 for previews, many of which were for sequels and remakes, reminded me that sometimes one has to pay a steep price when watching a movie, especially a Hollywood epic. Nearly three and a half hours later, I rose from my seat in the theater with a stunned look on my face and the realization that "steep price" I'd just paid was one of the best investments I ever made. Yes, "King Kong" was that good. No, make that great. Heck, make that one of, if not THE best Hollywood "epics" I have ever watched. The fact it was made by Peter Jackson, the brain behind the ambitiously-made "Lord of the Rings" series and a well-known 'nut' of the original "King Kong" film, only made it sweeter. I knew I'd be in for a ride, only I had no idea it would be this good. "King Kong" is divided in three acts. Act One takes place in New York, where filmmaker Carl Denham (Jack Black) is trying to convince his backers to allow him to finish his next film, a jungle adventure, on Skull Island, a legendary place of great unknown. Before they have the chance to say no to his face, he flees on a chartered steamer with the unfinished film, some equipment and an unemployed vaudeville performer named Ann Darrow (Naomi Watts), whom he intends to be the love interest in the film. Also tagging along (though somewhat unwittingly) is the film's writer, Jack Driscoll, star (played by Kyle Chandler) and some members of the film crew. Ann, whom we see as a struggling performer and victim of the depressing times in Act One, becomes the focal point in Act Two, which takes place on Skull Island. It only takes a few minutes (and some unruly cannibals) before the steamer's inhabitants realized it wasn't your average island. In addition to the unorthodox natives, Skull Island's residents are of the 'super-sized' variety, including spiders and snakes, beasts-thought extinct (such as Tyrannosaurus Rexes), and one very oversized ape. Ann captures the attention of the Beast, who snatches her and eventually protects her from attacks from not one, but two T-Rexes, in a breathtaking sequence that is just one of many in this fantastic film. If you're familiar with the original film, you know Act Three takes place after the Beast is captured. What sets it apart is the relationship between the Beast (now dubbed 'Kong') and Ann Darrow. Naomi Watts as Darrow is a revelation. Luminous is the word that jumps to mind. Her face lights up the screen. Bravo to Peter Jackson or whomever decided to cast her. Watts had to affect a gamut of emotions, while spending a big chunk of her screen time acting next to a CGI beast. To say it was a brilliant performance would be a huge understatement. She was supported solidly by Adrien Brody (basically playing himself) and Jack Black (thankfully NOT playing himself) and of course, Kong, who, for CGI purposes, was inhabited by Andy Serkis ("Gollum" from the Lord of the Rings series). But the star of the show may be Jackson. His film is set in 1933, the time of the original's release. Jackson faithfully recreates the era, including their dialogue as well as the mannerisms of its actors. This film was made with a lot of love - and a lot of money, but it shows. The special effects were, well, wow. At least that's what I audibly uttered on more than a few occasions. To heck with the others, just give "King Kong" Oscars for special effects, costume, sound and, who knows - best picture. As I said, it was that good. Boys and girls, THIS is what movies are all about; pure entertainment at the highest level. Bring a large tub of popcorn, find your ideal seat, and prepare yourself to be blown away like never before. **** (out of) ****

"Brokeback Mountain": There's a degree of irony in the commercial release of a gay-themed western. Initially, the producers of Ang Lee's "Brokeback Mountain" weren't comfortable releasing their film to a wider audience, fearing the country wasn't quite ready to accept a drama set in the 60's about a forbidden love affair between two men. In the film, these two men had to keep their love a secret because of a feared-backlash. How much has changed in some forty years? Here, in the state of Georgia where the film is in just one theater so far, not much apparently. "Brokeback Mountain" begins during the summer of 1963. Two young strangers, Jack Twist (Jake Gyllenhaal) and Ennis Del Mar (Heath Ledger) are both looking for seasonal work in the mountain region of Wyoming. Through a ranch foreman (played by Randy Quaid), they're hired as sheep herders. It's their responsibility to manage a large flock of sheep while making sure the sheep are protected from predators. Two cases of genetic predisposition, coupled with the long, lonely summer soon lead to more than just a simple friendship. The summer ends and the two men go home to their preconceived notions of an ordinary life: Ennis to his fiancée, Alma (Michelle Williams) in Wyoming, and Jack to his life as a budding rodeo performer in Texas. Ennis and Alma marry and become parents to two girls, while Jack settles down with the local rich girl (played by Anne Hathaway), with whom he becomes the parent of one boy. Ennis and Alma struggle to make a good life for their family, while Jack and his new bride adjust to working in her father's farm equipment business. All seems 'normal' enough except neither Jack nor Ennis can quite forget that memorable summer on Brokeback Mountain. After not seeing each other for four years, Jack revives the friendship through a simple "coming through town" postcard. After their "forbidden love" is successfully rekindled, the postcards become more frequent with the "old fishing buddies" arranging for long weekends together away from their families. This continues for many years, as their children grow, and Jack and Ennis' wives wonder why their men love spending so much time fishing together, yet never seem to bring back any fish. "Brokeback Mountain" was directed by Ang Lee and adapted (from a story by Annie Proulx) by Larry McMurty and Diana Ossana. Lee lovingly directs his cast, using sparse dialogue, the Canadian scenery (substituting for the story's Wyoming and Texas settings) and a good sense of pacing (along with some excellent editing) to tell Proulx's original story. The performances, especially Heath Ledger's, are all excellent. The problems I had with the film, however, lie in the screenplay. Ledger's character, Ennis Del Mar, is well-formed; his pain well-defined, but Gyllenhaal's Jack Twist, while clearly more comfortable in his skin (that much is explained), is woefully underdeveloped. It's as if whole scenes featuring Jack Twist and his life were missing from the final cut. Understanding Jack Twist might have led to a little more personal immersion, as well as heighten the intended emotional impact of the story. If only the celebrated screenwriters devoted as much time to Jack as they did Ennis. It's a pity because those 'missing scenes' might've resulted in a film worthy of the hype it's been receiving, but, in the presented product, I don't feel it quite deserves. *** (out of) ****

"Mrs. Henderson Presents": As an avid moviegoer, it's sometimes frustrating that the best films are saved for the end of the year, and we have to settle for 'just okay' during the rest of the time. In the case of Stephen Frears' latest, "Mrs. Henderson Presents," I wish I watched it last summer when I had to settle for the likes of "The Island." I'll just cut to the chase. "Mrs. Henderson Presents" isn't a great film; in fact, it's fairly flawed, but it does have one very compelling reason to see it: Judi Dench. She is amazing (and I mean *amazing*) in the title role of Mrs. Henderson, a charming widow suddenly free to do what she wants, including buying a theater and turning it into the second coming of Paris burlesque. That's mild for this day, but heady stuff if you're in England in the late 1930's. Mrs. Henderson hires Vivian Van Damme (Bob Hoskins), an experienced theater manager, to run her new diversion. Together, they hit upon a formula for success: stage performances that also feature the nude female form. A local censor (played by Christopher Guest), objects to the nudity, but after some convincing by Mrs. Henderson (who likens the performances to nude paintings in a museum) Lord Cromer is persuaded to allow the non-clothed portion, provided those particular performers remain perfectly still. "Mrs. Henderson Presents" was written by noted playwright Martin Sherman ("Bent"), who, at his best, fills his story with the stuff of wonderful backstage musicals (including some entertaining songs) and some hilarious dialogue. Unfortunately, Sherman chose to punctuated his story with war footage from the period, and after an entertaining first half of the film, the shift of focus (and a prolonged disappearance of its title character) interrupts the flow of the film and distracts us from the its strengths, including the great characters and the wonderful performances by their actors. I already gushed over Dame Judi Dench's performance (just engrave the Oscar, already!), but I'd be remiss if I didn't acknowledge the others, including Bob Hoskins, who matches up well with Dench, and Christopher Guest, who was deliciously dry as the stuffy censor. Also excellent were Will Young as a young singer, and Kelly Reilly, playing a stripper-with-a-heart-of-gold. If you're able to overlook its flaws, "Mrs. Henderson Presents" is a very entertaining experience at the movies. *** (out of) ****

"Syriana": has two taglines that truly say everything about it: "Everything is connected" and "What is the price of oil?" Writer-director Stephen Gaghan mines the same territory as his 2000 film "Traffic" (the narcotics-themed movie for which he deservedly won a Best Screenplay Oscar), only this time he's using multiple storylines and characters to tell the story of oil and the effect it has on the peoples' lives. Jeffrey Wright plays a Washington lawyer hired to sift through a complicated oil merger that may or may not be knee-deep in corruption. Mazhar Munir and Shahid Ahmed are father and son oilfield workers whose sudden unemployment due to the proposed merger tests their value systems. George Clooney is a CIA agent with a crisis-of-conscience. Matt Damon is an oil industry analyst who pays the ultimate price for oil, and Alexander Siddig plays an idealistic Arab prince who is waging a private war with his extremist brother for the heir to the throne, with the balance in the Middle East potentially hinging upon who eventually rises to power. Mixed into the stories are the secondary characters playing key parts. Christopher Plummer (what is not to love about this great actor?) is Wright's slimy boss; William C. Mitchell plays Wright's alcoholic father (the father and son theme runs throughout "Syriana"). Chris Cooper and Peter Gerety are the bosses of the two oil companies that are trying to merge, and Tim Blake Nelson (who has an incredible cameo) and William Hurt play mysterious characters that ultimately have a large impact on the story. Gaghan's film is filled with complicated blink-and-you'll-miss-it moments, but that's what's great about "Syriana." Personally, I LOVE these types of movies. The more intrigue, the better. And "Syriana" is absolutely bathing in it. I had to watch the film twice, just to finish playing connect-the-dots. And you know something? I still didn't connect them all. Surprisingly, for all its hot-button themes, Gaghan manages to keep his film balanced and fairly non-political, choosing only to ask us to understand our world's dependence on oil can have far-reaching ramifications. As a film, "Syriana" is almost overloaded with great actors playing great characters. You could almost fill all five Oscar supporting actor slots with performances from this film. Jeffrey Wright is the standout, but I loved the aforementioned Christopher Plummer and Tim Blake Nelson in their roles. George Clooney and Matt Damon were excellent and you can't go wrong if your movie features the great Chris Cooper as a cocky oil CEO. If you'd like to think you're on the tip of what's going on in the world AND you love great movies, this is the juice. And if you like to think about your movies, "Syriana" is for you. **** (out of) **** (In English, but this film also contains several scenes of Farsi and Arabic dialogue with English subtitles).

"Kiss Kiss, Bang Bang": Robert Downey Jr. is small-time thief/part-time actor Harry Lockhart. Harry, while running from the cops, becomes part of a movie audition. He wows the producers, immerses himself into the Hollywood scene and gets to play dick with a gay detective named Gay Perry (played by Val Kilmer). Yeah, I know; that last sentence makes little sense, but then again, neither did this movie. "Kiss Kiss, Bang Bang" is "Lethal Weapon" series creator, Shane Black's comeback chance. His disappearance for the better part of a decade resulted in another violent movie filled with unstable characters. He takes his love for Raymond Chandler to the extreme, sprinkling his film with femme fatales and rapid-fire jokes that read like throw-away lines from a ten-cent pulp fiction novel. "Kiss Kiss, Bang Bang, annoyingly narrated by an all-too-aware Downey, is supposed to be a great cult film in a Tarantino-esqued vein, but this QT fan just didn't get it. "Kiss Kiss, Bang Bang" plays like Shane Black's private little in-joke. It's too bad we're not privy to it. * 1/2 (out of) ****

"The Ice Harvest": "I'll have to see that" was my reaction after watching the coming attraction for Harold Ramis' "The Ice Harvest." "Well, that's 90 minutes I'll never get back" was my reaction after actually watching the film. And now I ask myself: is it worth more of my time trying to describe why I didn't like it? Not really. What I will tell you is that nice guy John Cusack tries to convince us that his mob lawyer character (who has to be making some serious coin) is dumb enough to not only steal $2 million from his gangster clients, but is willing to partner up with a shark (played by Billy Bob Thorton), and not immediately skip town. Throw in Oliver Platt as Cusack's drunken wiseass friend (despite the fact he stole Cusack's ex-wife); the requisite femme fatale (played by Connie Nielsen); some unnecessary violence, and more than enough Coen Brothers-circa-"Blood Simple" worshipping and you get a film without one single redeemable character (despite its casting of a few nice guy actors) that adds up to one heaping pile of, well, you get the idea. Stay away; far away. * (out of) ****

"Breakfast on Pluto": Patrick Brady (Conor McEvoy) had always been a little different. And it all started the day his birth mother left him on the doorstep of a priest (played by Liam Neeson). It doesn't take young Patrick very long before he figures out that he just wasn't cut out to be a boy. After a series of mishaps and missed identities, Patrick the adult (now played by Cillian Murphy, the villain in the recent "Red Eye") becomes "Kitten," wild child extraordinaire and friend of the Irish Republican Army. Director-writer, Neil Jordan revisits the territory he mapped in "The Crying Game," choosing to tell the story of his latest film "Breakfast on Pluto" in 36 short chapters, all within the context of a transvestite who isn't necessarily searching for his identity, but for his origins. And along the way, there's a lot to tell about "Kitten," but precious little to pique our interest. Jordan set his film in the late Sixties, early Seventies, using Ireland and its IRA, and London's glam-rock scene as the backdrop. Heck, the film even has Bryan Ferry (of Roxy Music, one of the early proponents of that scene) in a memorable cameo. Unfortunately, Jordan loses the seriousness of the violence of the IRA in favor of the frivolity and light-heartedness of Kitten's dalliances with his new attractive lifestyle. Forgetting how to properly frame his film is Jordan's fatal flaw. As Patrick "Kitten" Brady, Cillian Murphy does an excellent job of washing that man right out of his hair. Murphy narrates Kitten's story with a lot of flair, but ultimately, we just don't care. The film, unfortunately, is in the need of a complete rinse. * 1/2(out of) ****

"Walk the Line": A successful biopic occurs when you're either passive or know next to nothing about the subject going in, but leave after its conclusion wanting to know more. On that level, director and co-writer, James Mangold's treatment of music legend Johnny Cash in "Walk the Line," is a roaring success. Joaquin Phoenix plays Cash, depicting the perceived mental anguish of Cash's tragedy-dotted childhood to his humble beginnings as a musician with a unique new sound. The story also takes us on a tour of Cash's career, including his professional (before it became personal) relationship with June Carter (Reese Witherspoon) and how she helped him hurdle through the breakup of his marriage, his bout with pills and alcohol, and his constant struggle to wrestle with the other demon in his life: pleasing his father. For me, it was impossible to watch "Walk the Line" without thinking about last year's treatment of Ray Charles' life, "Ray." The lives of both men, while from different sides of the musical tracks, are strikingly similar, but those similarities don't make "Walk the Line" any less of a film. It lacks the character depth of "Ray," but "Walk the Line" makes up for it through the performances, both musically and through the wonderful acting of its cast. Joaquin Phoenix, who is the type of actor who needs the right role in order to standout from the ordinary (like his look-alike Billy Crudup) IS Johnny Cash, and the man can sing too! Reese Witherspoon, long one of my personal favorites, seems right at home as June Carter. She's also a talented singer. Her duets with Phoenix (who, like Witherspoon, did his own singing) were electric, which puts "Walk the Line" right up there with the great documentary concert films. It was that entertaining. Among the supporting performances, I especially loved Robert Patrick (best known as the baddie from "Terminator 2") as Johnny's hard-as-nails father. The character was a bit cliché, but Patrick makes you forget that. Hollywood loves to exploit successful formulas, but if "Ray" and "Walk the Line" are any indication, I say bring on another Elvis story! *** 1/2(out of) ****

"Paradise Now": As a human being, I fail to understand why another human being would be willing to kill, let alone kill him or herself in the process. As an American, I am at a loss how it could happen to us. Here; on our soil. But that's probably just part of our arrogance. Reminding myself of my first sentence, we're all human beings. The Palestinian film "Paradise Now" examines the lengths to which two Palestinian men would go to make a statement about the damage the Israelis are doing to their people. Said (Kais Nashef) and Khaled (Ali Suliman) work together as mechanics in an auto shop. They're Palestinians living in Nablus under Israeli rule and are certainly not happy. They're so unhappy that they're willing to allow themselves to be lured into becoming human test subjects for the next scheduled suicide bombing. One of the men is struggling with whether the cause is just, while the other believes deeply in his cause. However, one of the men is falling in love with the daughter of one of the movement's martyrs. She believes that the acts of suicide bombers are just giving their enemies an alibi. "Paradise Now" was written and directed by Hany Abu-Assad, who endured unusual pressure from both sides while trying to make his film. Abu-Assad does an effective job in his attempt to counter the media's image of the suicide bomber as just a religious fanatic. He also successfully explains how the bomber's "jihad" is not a holy war, but recognition that "life is a struggle." Paradise is the suicide bomber's condition for life, but life isn't always paradise. "Paradise Now" is an enormously thought-provoking film that takes you into the mindsets of two distinctly different world-views, and does this with just a few characters. It's a remarkable film. ***1/2 (out of) **** (In Arabic with English subtitles)

"Jarhead": When is a war film an anti-war film? That's the question I asked myself as I left the theater after watching Sam Mendes' ("American Beauty," "Road to Perdition") latest, "Jarhead," a film that doesn't really take a stance one way or the other. After all, war is hell, but shooting your weapon is cool, well, at least in the opinion of one Anthony "Swoff" Swofford, a young buck who decides to enlist in the Marines; to become a "Jarhead." His first active duty is Iraq in 1990 in the weeks leading up to Desert Storm, a war whose mission was accomplished entirely too quickly for one Marine's tastes. The film, in a style very reminiscent of Kubrick's "Full Metal Jacket," takes us through the brutal drill sergeant, the boot camp, the unstable soldier, the camaraderie between the men, even a sniper theme; all the clichés, but does it in a way that doesn't SEEM clichéd. Credit to director Mendes and his excellent cast, including Jake Gyllenhaal as Swoff, Peter Sarsgaard as his closest friend, Troy, and Scott MacDonald and Lucas Black as two fellow Marines. The film, which is based on Swofford's book about his experiences in the Gulf War, is filled with big performances in smaller roles including accomplished actors Jamie Foxx (as a puppeteer staff sergeant), Chris Cooper, and Dennis Haysbert. Also striking is the look of the film, which borrows the California desert for the Middle East and uses veteran Coen Bros. cinematographer Roger Deakins to effect its style. As a film, "Jarhead" doesn't have much of a point; well, if it did, it isn't telling. That's a little frustrating, but maybe that's the point. The anti-war crowd will find enough to be satisfied, while those who are not in opposition will be satiated. ***1/2 (out of) ****

"Capote": It was 1959, a time in Truman Capote's life when he was a very visible, very respected writer. The famed author of "Breakfast at Tiffany's" and the "Grass Harp" reveled in the attention, but like any good writer, he was always seeking his next story. He found it in a news account of the slaying of a family of four. Capote (played by Philip Seymour Hoffman) and his research assistant, one Nelle Harper Lee (Catherine Keener) head for the small town of Holcomb, Kansas to interview Alvin Dewey (Chris Cooper) who is heading up the murder investigation. Capote, who started writing the piece as a story for the New Yorker, soon finds it has grown much larger. After six years of interviewing the principles, including the two killers who are eventually incarcerated for the murders, Perry Smith (Clifton Collins Jr.) and Richard Hickok (Mark Pellegrino), the book "In Cold Blood" is born. The movie "Capote" is less about the book and more about its journey. We see Truman's friendship with Lee, who has just finished her Pulitzer Prize-winning novel, "To Kill a Mockingbird;" his struggle to keep his relationship with his patient partner (played by Bruce Greenwood), and Truman's very unhealthy obsession with Perry Smith. "Capote," like the film version of "In Cold Blood," is very methodically paced. Directed by Bennett Miller and written by Dan Futterman, "Capote" is highlighted by an absolute in-the-skin turn by Philip Seymour Hoffman, who, despite his six inch height advantage over Capote, completely nails his subject. The film also boasts a chilling performance by Clifton Collins Jr. as the creepy and manipulative killer, Perry Smith, as well as solid jobs by a modest Catherine Keener as Nelle Harper Lee, and Chris Cooper as the distrustful lead investigator. I would've liked a little more about Capote both before and after the period around "In Cold Blood," but that's a minor nitpick in an otherwise very satisfying film. ***1/2 (out of) ****

"The Squid and the Whale": I find it a bit ironic that a film about divorce and the way it can shatter a family, would seem to be the perfect vehicle for the skills of actor Kevin Kline. Well, it's Kline's young son, Owen, a product of one of Hollywood's few successful marriages (Kline to actress Phoebe Cates), who is one of the co-stars of "The Squid and the Whale," writer-director Noah Baumbach's autobiographical account of growing up as the son of novelist Jonathan Baumbach and former Village Voice critic, Georgia Brown. Noah is portrayed as Walt Berkman (Jesse Eisenberg). Walt and his younger brother, Frank (the aforementioned Owen Kline) suffer in a household of battling egos. His father, Bernard (Jeff Daniels) is a professor and a once-famous author now living off his reputation. Bernard is a wounded narcissist who can't accept the fact that his budding-writer wife Joan (Laura Linney) is about to surpass him as the success of the family. Something has to give and that something is the Berkman marriage. The film's tagline is "Joint Custody Blows," and that is so true in this case. Shuttling between parents on alternate days of the week isn't healthy for the 12 year-old Frank, who has issues associated with puberty, or 17 year-old Walt, who's becoming a little too much like his father. The results of this awkward arrangement form the rest of the film. The beauty of "The Squid and the Whale" lies in the brilliance of its script. There are no wasted scenes or dialogue. It's no wonder it won Best Screenplay at Sundance. I also love how Baumbach waves the proverbial middle finger at traditional film convention. His story is bawdy and unforgiving and filled with an honesty that just isn't found anymore. Shot for $1.5 million and running at 80 minutes, "The Squid and the Whale" covers more than films twice as long and fifty-times as expensive. And it helps that Jeff Daniels, Laura Linney, Owen Kline and Jesse Eisenberg are so good in their roles. "The Squid and the Whale" is French New Wave cinema for the modern age. *** 1/2 (out of) ****

"Proof": Oh, to be a genius. If we are to believe the movies, with brains come extreme mental disorder. The latest in the recent long line of such films is "Proof," David Madden's ("Shakespeare in Love") adaptation of David Auburn's successful play. Catherine (Gwyneth Paltrow) has spent her life living in the shadows of her famous mathematician father, Robert (Anthony Hopkins). Robert, who made all his major discoveries by the age of 26, has been living out the rest of his days on his legend and as a professor at the University of Chicago. Robert has, you guessed it, serious mental problems. His good and bad moments are measured by the year, not the day. Catherine also has moments of mathematics brilliance, but she's 27, so she's convinced that she's peaked. But Catherine isn't interested in keeping up with her father, even if she seems preconditioned for it. So much to her father's dismay, she attends the relatively nearby Northwestern. But despite her seemingly bright future, she ditches it all to attend to Robert when he becomes seriously ill. It's during that time that she's courted by Hal (Jake Gyllenhaal), one of Robert's students. Romance isn't her thing, but that doesn't stop Hal, who looks past her obvious growing depression and sees a lot of her father in Catherine. It's about an hour into the film that Hal discovers something else in Catherine that may or may not have a lot of Robert in it. And that's when "Proof" seeks proof. This film succeeds in large part because it chose the right people to execute its vision. Gwyneth Paltrow continues to show us why she's one of our best actresses. She's absolutely brilliant as the torturous Catherine. Anthony Hopkins is merely reprising several other performances, but we forgive him because he's still great. And Jake Gyllenhaal and Hope Davis (playing Catherine's sister, Claire) are well-cast in their roles. "Proof," like the math problems that are a part of its story, is a complex film, but then again, that was the intention of the filmmakers. ***1/2 (out of) ****

"Good Night, and Good Luck.": "Those who do not read and understand history are doomed to repeat it." It was during Harry Truman's second term that the Great Red Scare came into prominence. And much like today's assassination of the "liberal media" and famous media types like Dan Rather by the controlling political party of our country, back in the 50's it was Senator Joe McCarthy who convinced Americans of the evils of the communist party. And if the media dared to question the importance or logic of the threats, their allegiance or patriotism would be questioned. Sound familiar? It's Controlling the Media (and Ultimately, the People) 101. In 1953, it was long-time radio broadcaster (now television) journalist Edward R. Murrow who openly took on McCarthy and his scare tactics. Through his impeccable reputation and the CBS News program "See it Now," Murrow had the public on his side, while McCarthy had them afraid of talking to the wrong people. George Clooney, best known as an actor, makes a loud splash as co-writer (with Grant Heslov) and director of "Good Night, and Good Luck.," the story of Edward R. Murrow's infamous battles with Senator Joe McCarthy. Clooney also found time to act as Fred Friendly, Murrow's long-time producer and close friend. It was Friendly who counseled Murrow (David Strathairn) and acted as a buffer between his friend and CBS Television boss Bill Paley (played by a perfectly-casted Frank Langella). While we see obvious parallels between the situation of fifty years ago and today, the landscape is different. At CBS News back in the 50's, married couples weren't allowed to work together, so someone like Joe and Shirley Wershba (played by Robert Downey Jr. and Patricia Clarkson) had to hide their little secret. This is a little subplot in a film that's filled with plenty of interesting stories. Robert Elswit's camera (the film is in glorious black-and-white) takes us on a tour of the newsroom of the 50's, while Clooney's direction keeps the film well-paced and always compelling. "Good Night, and Good Luck." is breathtaking, from the letter-perfect performances of its wonderful ensemble cast, to the aforementioned direction, writing and cinematography; to the music (I loved the jazz singer touch) and sharp editing, but most of all: its message, that, sadly, still needs to be delivered. **** (out of) ****  

"Elizabethtown": Writer-director Cameron Crowe is sort of a Hollywood Everyman. He makes films that appeal on a deep level to both genders ("You had me at hello;" "I am a Golden God!") but for someone like myself, I'm just happy he can generally be counted upon to make a good movie. Unfortunately, after watching his latest, "Elizabethtown," Crowe's losing streak (beginning with "Vanilla Sky") now stands at two. Drew Baylor (Orlando Bloom) is a highly-regarded shoe designer who just tasted failure, big time, with his latest shoe. The disaster, somewhere between a "failure and a fiasco," cost his bosses nearly one BILLION dollars. Drew, who is obviously "so fired," uses the occasion of his father's funeral in Elizabeth, Kentucky to try to reconnect with himself, and, if the mood strikes him, with the people from whom he grew so distant. It's a Crowe film so there has to be romance for our hero, oh, and a lot of excellent music. It's here where Cameron Crowe does not disappoint. The songs play like the perfect I-Pod mix, and Kirsten Dunst, as the requisite love interest, has got the cute thing down pat. She also plays annoying very well, so much so that it can sometimes border on, well, annoying. She's flight attendant Claire Colburn, who seems to be reasonably happy with her station in life, even though we're never quite sure what that is. She's the bubbly girl to Drew's flat dude who just wants to figure it all out on his own. They meet while Drew is on his way to Kentucky. Long story short, they do the get-together thing, but only after lots of weird funeral experiences, some interesting (and too short) travelogue scenes, and all that great music that is a staple of Crowe's films. Dunst was very effective as the quirky Claire, but Orlando Bloom just seemed out of place as the brooding shoe designer. I guess John Cusack wasn't available. Crowe, the accomplished writer, manages to write some nice dialogue and come up with some nice ideas, but he can't put it all together in a fluid script. His thoughts are incomplete and his characters not fleshed out enough. All this sabotages the job for Crowe, the director, not to mention his editor, who had to piece together Crowe's ideas, a la Crowe's nom de plume William Miller in "Almost Famous," who compiled his big story for Rolling Stone through a lot of tiny Post-It notes. Old habits dying hard, Cameron? My advice with "Elizabethtown" is the same for Crowe's last disappointment: buy the soundtrack, skip the movie. ** (out of) ****

"Nine Lives": is nine vignettes of nine women told in nine long takes. The nine women also carry nine loads of baggage, some of which we care about, some we don't. In short, this is a gimmick film that doesn't flaunt its angle, but doesn't get out of its way either. The film was written and directed by Rodrigo Garcia, who is best known of the son of famed writer, Gabriel Garcia Marquez. Garcia, through his vast connections (including his extensive work as a director for some of HBO's better shows) was able to assemble a very impressive cast of actors for his film, including Glenn Close, Sissy Spacek, Holly Hunter, Kathy Baker, Aidan Quinn, Amy Brenneman, Joe Mantegna, Ian McShane, Molly Parker, Robin Wright Penn, and Jason Isaacs, to name a handful. It's quite an ensemble. Their performances were excellent (especially Wright Penn and Isaacs), but that still doesn't make me care enough about the characters. Garcia is clearly an ambitious writer and filmmaker, but tosses a few too many ingredients into his special dish. He allows about ten minutes for each story, which just isn't enough time to understand, let alone develop an interest in, the characters, which, with just a few exceptions, disappear after their segment has concluded. Along with that disappearance is our rooting interest for that person. We see tale after tale of unrequited love, whether it's from a neglectful parent, or a lost love, or because of the "system." Not a bad concept, but it would've worked better outside the constraints of Garcia's single-take system. It would've been nice to see the stories and characters intersect. And that approach would've led to some appropriate closures that most of the individual segments sorely needed. "Nine Lives" is best left for that rainy Sunday afternoon when you're in a bit of a blue mood and there's nothing worth watching on television. **1/2 (out of) ****

"A History of Violence": I recently reviewed "Red Eye," a film directed by horror-master Wes Craven. I opined his knowledge of the horror genre helped him handle the thriller. David Cronenberg's horror tends to be a little more, um, 'explicit,' that, like Craven's recent effort, "A History of Violence" is a departure for the veteran writer-director, or at least that's how it starts. Tom Stall (Viggo Mortensen) is a quiet, modest family man with an attractive wife (played by Maria Bello), two children and the respect of his community. He runs a diner in a small town in Indiana. Tom's life is forever shattered one day during an attempted robbery at the diner. Thanks to Tom's quick actions, he not only stops the robbery, he also kills the perpetrators. He's quickly branded a hero by the town, as well as the media, who grab onto the story. It isn't long before Tom's heroics captures the attention of a few mysterious men from out-of-town, including one man (played by Ed Harris) who claims he has a history with Tom, whom he remembers as "Joey Cusack from Philly." Tom, it seems, has a…"history of violence," and that modest display of heroics was just "Joey" doing his thing. It isn't long before Cronenberg's film dissolves into, well, a Cronenberg film. That's not to say that weird things start coming out of the wrong places, but weird things definitely start happening. Paths are taken that a director with a better grasp for this type of material (unlike Wes Craven, whose style aided "Red Eye") would've avoided. It's almost a shame that this otherwise fine idea (and some nice performances from the principle actors, especially Ed Harris) is wasted when the director allows the fine idea to get away. I'd like to recommend this film, but I can't. Give it ten years and perhaps someone else will remake it into something better. ** (out of) ****

"Corpse Bride": Is it fair to give a film a little "extra credit" if, on a technical basis, it sets itself apart from others? I ask this rhetorically as I ponder to myself how to describe my feelings about Tim Burton's latest puppet-filled stop-motion animation effort, "Corpse Bride." Burton co-directed "Corpse Bride" with Mike Johnson, whose previous work included "James and the Giant Peach" (as an animator). "Peach's" director, Henry Selick, worked with Tim Burton on "The Nightmare Before Christmas." That effort was beautiful to watch, but otherwise boring. Burton's "Corpse Bride" retains some of "Nightmare's" creepiness, but, despite its title, is mostly harmless. Emily, the Corpse Bride (voiced by Helena Bonham Carter), is a former jilted bride, who, because of "circumstances" now "lives" under the earth in a spooky graveyard. One night, while walking alone through the graveyard, a young man (Johnny Depp) jokingly places his arranged intended's wedding ring on a protruding branch. That "branch" turns out to be the Corpse Bride's ring finger, and the ring is now as good as a promise of marriage. It's bad enough that the young man is about to marry a living woman he just met (arranged by the bride's financially-strapped parents), but now he's been latched onto by a dead woman with a marriage fetish! The story of the "Corpse Bride" is much more involved than just that, but there's pleasure in uncovering its various layers. The film is filled with great characters (the voice talent includes Tracey Ullman, Emily Watson, Albert Finney, Joanne Lumley, and Jane Horrocks) and some nice musical numbers, which, as you might imagine, were well-choreographed within the context of the film's story and gimmick of the stop-motion process. The script, co-written by John August and Pamela Pettler, is clever, and unlike other films of this type, its pacing isn't tedious. It would be a little creepy as a live-action film, but as an animated film, the "Corpse Bride" is a ghoulish treat that yes, for the technical marvel it is, deserves extra credit. *** (out of) ****

"Red Eye": A director with a handle for the material is usually the difference between a good and a bad film, especially if it's a tired genre. In the case of "Red Eye," it's horror film director Wes Craven trying to make sense out of the terrorist-on-a-plane plot. And you know something? He made it work. Rachel McAdams is Lisa Reisert, a hotel manager with a real knack for solving problems. The aptly-named Jack Rippner (Cillian Murphy) has a problem that needs to be solved. His "organization" is targeting the head of Homeland Security, William Keefe (Jack Scalia), but they need Keefe and his entourage (including his family) to stay in a hotel room facing the water. Jack sees Lisa and her love for her father as the way around this little predicament. He befriends her in the airport lounge before the flight, manages to sit next to her on the plane, and then shows off his true self to her shortly after their night flight takes off. I've already told you quite a bit, so I'll resist giving it all away, but suffice to say there are thrills and a few chills with the expertise of Wes Craven keeping the film from landing in the ho-hum pile of Hollywood clichés. Extra credit goes to first-time writer Carl Ellsworth, who, like me, is probably a stickler for realism in film. He seemed to have all the answers to the "how can they do that?" situations that plague films of this type. "Red Eye" isn't an extraordinary film by any stretch of the imagination, but it is a very effective thriller. *** (out of) ****

"The Constant Gardener": Tessa Quayle (Rachel Weisz) is convinced that when her husband Justin (Ralph Fiennes) sleeps, he dreams of a world without weeds. Justin is a part-time obsessive gardener and full-time British diplomat. But it's Tessa who would like to rid the world of a few unwanted weeds. The outspoken activist has a serious axe to grind against the pharmaceutical company who circumvented the FDA approval process in order to force-feed a controversial TB drug to the helpless in Africa. Tessa discovers proof the drug is a condition towards getting treatment, and that it's killing, not helping, the sick and poor. These are little-known facts the drug company would do anything to keep secret; anything, including the senseless murder of Tessa and her colleague, Arnold Bluhm (Hubert Kounde). I'm not giving much away since this happens during the film's first act and serves as the film's main premise. The balance of "The Constant Gardener" is spent in flashback and present time, as the otherwise low-key diplomat takes up his dead wife's cause in the hope it will also uncover the mystery behind her murder. "The Constant Gardener" was directed by Fernando Meirelles, whose previous film, "City of God" was one of the greatest films I've ever watched. He certainly doesn't disappoint with this follow-up. Meirelles is a rare filmmaker who is able to translate his enormous vision into a cogent presentation. He takes the smart script (by Jeffrey Caine, based on the John Le Carré best-selling novel) and effuses his style without sacrificing the credibility of the tale. In addition to good architects, "The Constant Gardener" is blessed with fine performances from its leads (Ralph Fiennes and Rachel Weisz) as well as memorable turns from its co-stars Danny Huston and Pete Postlethwaite. The film's topic isn't pretty and it should leave you angry, but that's the idea. *** 1/2 (out of) ****

"Lord of War": For bloodthirsty action film fans, there's probably nothing worse than a movie with a moral center, especially one that blurs the line between the good and bad guys. And it doesn't help when the film's message doesn't exactly flatter the leaders of your country. "Evil prevails when the good fail to act." Ouch. Reads like a good bumpersticker. Set in the early 80's, the "Lord of War" spans twenty years in the life of Yuri Orlov (Nicholas Cage), a Ukrainian who grew up in New York in a family that pretended it was Jewish. Years later, Yuri's family pretend they don't know that he's one of the world's most "productive" arms dealers. Yuri starts small, enlisting the aid of his younger brother, Vitaly (Jared Leto) to watch his back while Yuri quickly builds his notorious list of clients, mostly military leaders who are anxious to gain an edge on their enemies. The film depicts Yuri's rise and fall, as well as the lives he touches, including Vitaly, who battles drug addiction, and Yuri's trophy wife (played by Bridgit Moynahan) who doesn't want to know how he's making his millions. Yep, everybody's in denial, especially Yuri, who's convinced he's able to escape anything and anyone, including the guilt from the lives he indirectly ends and from the Interpol agent (Ethan Hawke) who's been trying to pin him down for years. "Lord of War" was very smartly written and directed by Andrew Niccol ("Gattaca"), who based his story "on actual events," which could be taken a number of ways. I was intrigued by the premise and mood of the film, which was a lot like "Goodfellas" with guns, even down to surveillance helicopters and the witty narrative by its star, Nicholas Cage. Cage was excellent as the morally-corrupt and completely delusional gunrunner. Jared Leto almost steals the film (this talented actor needs to be in more films) as another casualty of Yuri's poor career choice. "Lord of War" covers a subject I personally loathe, but it does it in a non-exploitive and (surprisingly) non-preachy way. Recommended. *** (out of) ****

 "Cronicas": John Leguizamo plays Manolo Bonilla, a semi-famous reporter for a Miami-based Spanish-language TV station. His work takes him all over Latin America, but in this particular week, he travels to Equador, where he hopes to uncover the infamous "Monster" serial killer of children, who has been terrorizing the countryside and is blamed for over 150 murders. Bonilla, who is accompanied by his producer (played by Leonor Watling) and camerman (Jose Maria Yazpik), quickly finds controversy in the form of a near-lynching of a man whose car struck the twin brother of a recent victim of the Monster. The driver of the vehicle (played by Damian Alcazar) becomes a bit of a hero when his story of mob rule injustice is aired all over the country. The problem is that he knows a little too much about the elusive Monster, which leads to a conflict for Bonilla, who effectively made the new hero but has a self-responsibility to find the serial killer. But "Cronicas" is less about all of the above and more about the evils of the media and the lengths to which they will go to find a story. The film's writer-director, Sebastian Cordero does a masterful job of straddling the moral line of his story, while not losing focus or his viewer. The look of his film is often mesmerizing, while its score (from Antonio Pinto, best known for "City of God") is memorable and the performances, especially from John Leguizamo, outstanding. I especially liked the way Cordero handled the film's ending. He could've taken it in a number of different directions, but ultimately chose the smartest, which is appropriate for this intelligent thriller. ***1/2 (out of) **** (In Spanish with English subtitles)

"5x2": Couple gets a divorce, has a child, marries, falls in love and meets. Five acts, two people. If you place the sequences in order (like the French DVD), it's standard stuff. Flip it around and it's pretentious without the worthy payoff. Writer-director Francois Ozon, who's been on quite a roll lately with "Swimming Pool," "8 Women," "Under the Sand," and "Water Drops on Burning Rocks," hits a speed bump with "5x2." The French filmmaker is a talent, but this is the stuff of someone with a serious chip on his shoulder but without the brawn to back it up. Valeria Bruni Tedeschi and Stephane Freiss play the couple. Their performances are solid, but their characters don't invite our sympathies or our contempt. Like the people they play, we don't feel anything, and that doesn't make watching this film a worthwhile experience. * 1/2 (out of) **** (In French with English subtitles)

"The Best of Youth": is as complete a film as you'll ever see. It's hauntingly beautiful, both in appearance and in spirit. It's also six hours long, but don't you dare allow that to stop you from experiencing this monumental achievement from veteran Italian director Marco Tullio Giordana. The film's celebrated running time allows it to flesh out every aspect of its rich story. The "Best of Youth" starts in Rome, Italy in 1966, where four college-aged friends prepare for a fun journey to Norway. Circumstance and a woman sidetrack the trip, but not the enduring friendships. The woman, Giorgia (Jasmine Trinca) is a beautiful but tortured mental patient who captures the fancy of two of the men, brothers Nicola (Luigi Lo Cascio) and Matteo (Alessio Boni). Nicola is a medical student, while Matteo isn't sure what to do with his life. He connects with Giorgia because he's also lost, while the good-hearted Nicola finds a fascination within Giorgia's life and eventually, psychiatric medicine. But that's just one very small part of the "Best of Youth." We're also taken through the great Florence flood of 1966 (where Nicola meets his true love) and through the Red Brigades of the 70's (which forms a major part of the story) and through all the changes of the film's many characters as they live, die and procreate through the four decades. Giordana's film (which was lovingly scripted by partners Sandro Petraglia and Stefano Rulli) is filled with memorable characters and beautiful storylines involving not only the lives of the four friends and their families, but since the film spans nearly forty years, also the lives of their children. Giordana, who's flush with time, uses it to show us everything (including the lush beauty of Italy), but never pours it on or resorts to trickery. The filmmaking is very straightforward and its story well-paced, which is amazing given its length. The plot twists are simple but not overbearing, and we're not asked to swallow a silly storyline. The acting is wonderful and the characters are lovely. In other words, it's never boring. The "Best of Youth" is filmmaking at its finest, and yes, it's worth every minute. **** (out of) **** (In Italian with English subtitles)

"Four Brothers": invites a double-standard. Why is it okay for Quentin Tarantino to "find serious inspiration" in a genre of films, but it's not okay for an established filmmaker like John Singleton to "pay homage" to a different class of films? Well, when the genre (low-budget drive-in revenge flicks) lacks camp value and was never redeemable in the first place, it's just a bad idea. And director Singleton, who has yet to build upon the enormous promise of his debut effort, "Boyz n the Hood," gives us 110 minutes of a very bad idea. Four young men, each born to a different set of parents, are "rescued" by matriarch Evelyn Mercer (Fionnula Flanagan), who plucks them off the mean streets of Detroit and into her home. Fast-forwarding several years, the adopted brothers, Bobby (Mark Wahlberg), Jerry (Andre Benjamin, aka Andre 3000), Angel (Tyrese Gibson) and Jack (Garrett Hedlund) reunite to find the people responsible for gunning down their adopted mother whose murder during a convenience store robbery may or may not have been premeditated. Thus begins a serious of stupid events leading up to a fairly predictable climax. The movie is violent; the performances unremarkable and the mood foul. If John Singleton spent as much time on the film as he did on the Detroit product placements (Domino's, GMC, Ford, not to mention the Tigers, Lions and Red Wings), or bothered to film most of it in Detroit (instead of Toronto), it might've resulted in a decent movie; instead we have this. * 1/2(out of) ****

"March of the Penguins": I've always been fascinated by instinct. How does a cat know to use its wet paw to clean its face? Nature is filled with animals that didn't have the benefit of teachers (beyond their parents), books and training seminars to teach them how to act, much less how to survive. Documentary film director Jacques Perrin and his crew of a few (including two cinematographers) set out to discover the unique mating habits of the penguin. Their exploration took them to Antarctica, the natural habitat of the Emperor penguin, where on a GOOD day, it's "just" 59 below. The crew, with loving care, braved the treacherous weather (and it looked brutal) to show us how the male and female penguins endure more than you can imagine just to reproduce. This wonderful film makes us feel like we're in a classroom all over again, only we didn't have the privilege of threading the projector. Part of the beauty of this documentary (aside from its scrumptious scenery) is learning about the penguins' unusual habits, so I'll allow the rest to unfold in front of your own eyes. But I will say that this may be one of the most passionate love stories ever filmed, which is pretty heady stuff for a G-rated documentary. "March of the Penguins" is a lot warmer than Antarctica and about as fuzzy as a young penguin, and as a film experience, it's a sheer delight. *** 1/2(out of) ****

"Broken Flowers": When you think of Bill Murray, you think of that silly groundskeeper in "Caddyshack" or his turns in "Ghostbusters," "Stripes" and "Groundhog Day." And then there's his moody aging actor in "Lost in Translation." Murray channels that character for his latest role as successful computer executive, Don Johnston. The now semi-retired Don (a.k.a. Don Juan) has made a great deal of money in the computer business, but he's never married. He seems content to lounge around all day, watching movies and cartoons that mirror his own situation. This doesn't sit well with his latest girlfriend (played very briefly by Julie Delpy) who, like the many others, leaves him. His life changes one day when a mysterious pink envelope arrives with the mail. Inside is a letter from a woman purporting to be an old girlfriend with a 19-year-old son she claims is Don's; a son the otherwise childless Don never knew he had. The letter isn't signed and the envelope contains no clues to its origin. After a little detective work, Don's best friend, Winston (Jeffrey Wright), convinces his reluctant buddy to seek out the mysterious letter writer. They conclude it could be any of four women: divorcee Laura (Sharon Stone); eccentric Dora (Frances Conroy); animal freak Carmen (Jessica Lange); or biker "enthusiast" Penny (Tilda Swinton). Winston researches their whereabouts, books the flights and rental cars, and the "stalking with a Taurus" Don Juan is off on what turns out to be a journey of self-discovery. "Broken Flowers" is otherwise somewhat indescribable. We think we know what's going to happen, but we don't. Writer-director Jim Jarmusch peppers his film with sly comic moments, but keeps us a little in the dark about his characters. He'd rather his audience reach their own conclusions, which is the way it should be. Watching "Broken Flowers," I am reminded a lot of Sofia Coppola's work in the aforementioned "Lost in Translation." This film could've been written and directed by her, but that's just an observation and is not meant as a slight to the extremely talented Jarmusch. As you might expect from such a stellar cast, the performances in "Broken Flowers" are otherworldly. Bill Murray is perfect as the expressionless Don Johnston ("with a 'T'"), while Jeffrey Wright delivers a very memorable turn as Winston. His past loves, like their relationships with Don, come and go a little too quick, but they're quite good. The rest of the cast, including Chloe Sevigny, Alexis Dziena, and Pell James have blink-and-you'll-miss-them roles, but they're very solid. "Broken Flowers" is long on charm and never short on smiles, well, unless you're Bill Murray's character. Recommended highly. ***1/2 (out of) ****

"The Island": For some, the name Michael Bay is synonymous with all that's wrong with Hollywood: lots of explosions, very little plot, insulting formulas. But his films (the "Bad Boys" films; "The Rock," "Armageddon," "Pearl Harbor") make money, and that's the bottom line in Hollywood. Bay, however, fancies himself a talent capable of reaching our deeper consciousness. Uh, no. Sorry. Impossible POV shots, does not a filmmaker make. Against my better judgment (damn you, Scarlett Johansson!), I watched Bay's latest attempt. "The Island" takes place in the world of the future where, for the right price, you can part out a clone of yourself if, say, your liver is failing. Theoretically, if you're rich enough, you can live forever. Hey, it's a Hollywood movie, not reality! Ewan McGregor and the aforementioned Scarlett Johansson (both chasing the paydays) play a couple of clones living underground with a bunch of other clones, all away from the contaminated outside world. Their handlers (led by Sean Bean, performing the same role he plays in every film) lead the clones to believe they're working towards going to the Island, a sort of utopian paradise that was mysteriously unharmed by the contamination. They're fed with memories of a past life, but conveniently they lack a sex drive, which explains why McGregor isn't immediately drawn to Johansson. Details. And speaking of details, the first half of the film is filled with ambitious, if not a little (okay, a LOT) of implausible reasons for this alternative world. The second half of the film is a typical Bay-fest, with a lot of silly action and a WHOLE lot of impossible sequences. The performances were okay, but the white suits were better. Bay channels so many sci-fi films in this effort that I was half-expecting Farrah Fawcett and Gil Gerard to show up. In short, if you must see this film, make sure you check your brain with the usher. ** (out of) ****

"Lords of Dogtown": is the story of the origins of the serious skateboard scene. Heath Ledger plays Skip Engblom, the owner of a Southern California surf shop. Skip develops a revolutionary new wheel that allows skaters to "grip" their surfaces. A skateboarding team, led by soon-to-be-legends Jay Adams (Emile Hirsch), Tony Alva (Victor Rasuk) and Stacy Peralta (John Robinson) is formed by Skip, and together they grow as the skateboarding craze grows. I was attracted to this film because, like the subjects, I grew up in California during the Seventies and spent time around skateboards. And not surprisingly, since the film's writer (Stacy Peralta) was one of the Z-Boys portrayed in the film, "Lords of Dogtown" generally gets it right, but it suffers from an aura of cheapness and creates an atmosphere of apathy. This isn't "Dazed and Confused: The Skater Edition." It isn't even the documentary "Dogtown and Z-Boys." It's just a low-budget version of somebody's interpretation of events that happened thirty years earlier. The film's nicest character happens to be Stacy (surprise!) while the rest of the actors either wildly overact (especially Heath Ledger, doing his worst Gary Busey impersonation) or seem out of place as skaters, while their stunt doubles do all the work. One of my biggest disappointments about "Lords of Dogtown" was that it was directed by Catherine Hardwicke, whose debut film "Thirteen" was so promising. Like Peralta (who directed the original "Dogtown" documentary and has been involved in other skateboarding-related films), perhaps it's time for her to move onto more "mature" subjects. *1/2 (out of) ****

"Cinderella Man": Most of us remember Ron Howard as Opie on "The Andy Griffith Show" and as Richie Cunningham on "Happy Days," but for nearly three decades Howard has been a successful director in Hollywood, helming such features as "Splash," "Cocoon," "Parenthood," "Apollo 13" and "A Beautiful Mind." Howard's latest is "Cinderella Man," the based-on-a-true-story of boxer Jim Braddock, whose life was an inspiration for the downtrodden of the Depression era. Russell Crowe plays Braddock, a gentle man who happens to earn his living with his fists. Braddock nearly rises to the top of the heavyweight ranks, but a bad break and the onset of the Depression put him and his family on the breadlines along with millions of other struggling families. After a number of years of lining up with the day laborers, Braddock is given another opportunity in the ring and, well, it's a Cinderella story, so you can figure out the rest. Russell Crowe, who delivers another outstanding performance as Jim Braddock, is supported nicely by Renee Zellweger in the unglamorous role of Braddock's wife, Mae. Of special note are Craig Bierko as Max Baer, the fearsome heavyweight champ of the era, and the always interesting Bruce McGill as a ruthless boxing promoter. Director Ron Howard, working off a script by Cliff Hollingsworth and Akiva Goldsman, does an excellent job of balancing the story of proud family man, loyal husband and professional boxer. "Cinderella Man" often strides the careful bridge of predictability, but it's well-paced and entertaining. Recommended. *** (out of) ****

"Madagascar": Feature-length animated movies have come a long way. They used to be Disney's forte. They'd pop out a movie every once in a while, much to the pleasure of the younger set. And now we have computer animation, multiple studios, and well-known voice talent. And it's all to the delight of not only children, but adults as well. The summer season's first big animated film is "Madagascar," the story of zoo animals returning to the wild. The penguins at New York City's Central Park Zoo are plotting an escape. They're pretty anxious to return to their "Antarctica roots," and by jove, a broken plastic spoon isn't going to thwart their digging efforts. The penguins' longing for the wild has Marty the Zebra (voiced by Chris Rock) thinking the same, only to somewhere a little warmer; somewhere like Connecticut. Marty makes his move during the evening of his tenth birthday (silly midlife crisis!), slipping out into the wild of the New York City subway system. Once his buddies at the zoo, including Alex the Lion (Ben Stiller), Gloria the Hippo (Jada Pinkett Smith) and Melman the Giraffe (David Schwimmer), discover he's escaped, they're doing their own disappearing act in an effort to convince him the zoo's his real home. Thus begins the zoo animals' journey, ultimately leading to a trip via a container ship that gets diverted to Madagascar, home of a bunch of wild lemurs. The lemurs, led by their king (voiced by Sacha Baron Cohen, aka 'Ali G') see the animals as a way to protect them from their natural enemies. Meanwhile, Alex the Lion, now off his steady raw steak diet, begins to see everyone as dinner. As far as animated fare goes, "Madagascar" doesn't stand out from the rest of the pack. The computer animation is good, the story (by Mark Burton and Billy Frolick) flows nicely and the film (directed by cartoon vets Eric Darnell and Tom McGrath) is solid. "Madagascar" succeeds where it should: as wholesome entertainment for small children. The three small children I took to the film loved it. I just thought it was cute, but nothing special. In other words, see it with the children in your life; otherwise wait for the DVD or a long plane-trip. ** 1/2(out of) ****

"The Return": The quiet lives of a woman (Natalya Vdovina) and her two sons, Andrei (Vladimir Garin) and Ivan (Ivan Dobronravov), are suddenly disrupted by the reappearance (after an absence of twelve years) of a man (Konstantin Lavronenko) the woman introduces as the boys' father. The man has a tough, but quiet exterior and is anxious to establish himself as the boys' authority figure. With their mother's permission, the man and the boys set off on a three-day fishing trip that takes the three up the beautiful coast of Russia (the exact location is never given). The older boy, Andrei, is content to obey the man he believes is his long-lost father, but Ivan is skeptical and is constantly testing the man's patience. In return, the man shows Ivan who is in charge. The film's story is deliberately mysterious, giving us just a dollop here and there; teasing us with its intentions. Is the man who he says he is? Why was he gone for twelve years? Why the sudden fishing trip? The look of "The Return" is almost like a 100-minute car commercial, so it shouldn't come as a shock that its first-time director, Andrei Zvyagintsev, comes from that background. He, along with cinematographer, Mikhail Krichman, created an exquisite look, aiding in the mood of the film. I understand why the film won or was nominated for several awards, including a nomination for the 2004 Golden Globe for Best Foreign Film. "The Return" is a moody, atmospheric thriller that won't leave you right away. Just like a good film. *** 1/2 (out of) **** (In Russian with English subtitles). On DVD.

"Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith": The Star Wars franchise is a force. Okay, that was a bad pun, but the series, which started in 1977 and has produced six films to date (and I'm not convinced this is it), has grossed well over a billion dollars worldwide. That's success. It's been enjoyed by fans and critics alike, but I think we can all agree this isn't the Royal Shakespeare Company. It's a futuristic action adventure and if it's taken as such, it can be a lot of fun. The latest adventure picks up where Episode II: Attack of the Clones left off. Padmé (Natalie Portman) is pregnant with Luke and Leia, but hasn't told anyone that Anakin (Hayden Christensen) is the father. Anakin has his own struggles, as he is becoming disenchanted with the Jedis and more entranced by the Dark Side, aided by the propaganda that Supreme Chancellor Palpatine (Ian McDiarmid) is feeding him. The Jedi Council, led by Mace Windu (Samuel L. Jackson), Obi-Wan Kenobi (Ewan McGregor) and guided by Yoda (the voice of Frank Oz), are very distrustful of Palpatine, whom we already know is also Darth Sidious and part of the Dark Side. Since we know the origin of Darth Vader and some of the characters from Episodes IV - VI, I'll let you absorb the action for yourself. Once again, "Revenge of the Sith" was written and directed by "Star Wars" creator, George Lucas. I admit I hoped (as rumored) he would hand off the last two films to someone different, but too little, too late. The film's performance are a little better than usual, especially Natalie Portman, whose Padmé character finally shows a little range. But the film's best performance belongs to Ian McDiarmid as the evil Darth Sidious (it was as if he were channeling a real-life figure. Hmm.). "ROTS" is better than its two most recent predecessors, but that isn't saying much. Those films succeeded by virtue of their action-adventure, plus some incredible CGI. "ROTS" improves upon the others in many key ways, and has cleaned up some of the problems (most notably the wooden dialogue; it's still there, but it's improved), but the novelty has worn off. I've never considered myself a "Star Wars" junkie, having seen each of the films just once in the theater, and never once in costume! I would say once is enough for "Revenge of the Sith." *** (out of) ****

"Undertow": When does it become acceptable for a filmmaker to take a huge helping of poetic license? When the finished product is good, very good. Thus is the case of writer-director David Gordon Green, whose previous films owed a ton to Terrence Malick ("Badlands," "Days of Heaven"). Green's third effort, "Undertow," lightens up a little on the Malick comparisons, but borrows several pages of script from Charles Laughton's classic, "Night of the Hunter," as well as a serious ode to the films and television shows of the Seventies, all of which worked very well towards setting the proper mood for his film. But, like Quentin Tarantino, all is forgiven when the resulting work (like the "Kill Bill" films) is great. "Undertow" is the story of John Munn (Dermot Mulroney) and his two sons: teenager Chris (Jamie Bell), who was always getting himself in trouble, and Tim (Devon Alan), a sickly child with several phobias. Their lives have been upside down since the boys' mother passed away. John pulled his sons out of school and moved them to a small farm in rural Georgia. Their home is so isolated that Tim's tenth birthday "party" consisted of just the three of them. Their new location also proves to be a task to find for John's brother Deel (Josh Lucas), who looks up his sibling immediately after his release from a local prison. Deel has an ulterior motive for his visit: gold. Deel and John's father once stole a cache of Mexican gold coins, the latter promising he'd leave them for his boys to split so they could "treat themselves like kings." For obvious reasons, John didn't bother to share the ill-gotten gains with his then-incarcerated brother. If you watched "Night of the Hunter" (if not, you should), you can figure out the rest of the plot. "Undertow" isn't original but has a lot going for it, including a likeable cast (led by Jamie Bell, best known for "Billy Elliot"), a solid script, and a director on the verge of greatness. David Gordon Green, who showed a ton of promise with "George Washington" and "All the Real Girls," graduates with "Undertow." It's well-paced, beautifully photographed (by Green regular, Tim Orr) and despite its various influences, not overly predictable. "Undertow" is a true gem. ***1/2 (out of) **** (On DVD).

"Oldboy": I'm discovering that cult films are not always to my liking. As an admitted film geek, the edgier the film, the better, but my age, and films of higher quality must be catching up to me. I went to see "Oldboy" on the strength of its massive cult following (the 2003 film is just getting its U.S. release, primarily because of the "people"). Unfortunately, like "House of Flying Daggers" and "Kung Fu Hustle," I just couldn't get into it. The film's story revolves around the fifteen-year imprisonment and torture of Oh Dae-su (Choi Min-sik). The Korean man is held against his will in a large, otherwise unassuming room outfitted with a bed and TV, which he watches when he isn't recording a journal. While watching the news, he learns he's a wanted murderer, so even though he feels he's innocent he's probably safest right where he is, even if he is subjected to nightly gas treatments (that's how his room and clothing are maintained) and the same pot-sticker meals (which the hot-tempered Oh often discards in disgust). When the fifteen years pass, Oh is suddenly back on the street (I don't want to give too much away), but instead of putting his past behind him, he's hell-bent for revenge against his former captors, as well as trying to unlock the mystery that surrounded the reasons for his captivity. "Oldboy" was co-written and directed by acclaimed South Korean filmmaker, Chan-wook Park. The film won the 2004 Grand Jury Prize at Cannes, as well as praise from audiences around the world, but it left me wondering about its point and whether I, like the film's subject, am losing it. ** (out of) **** (In Korean with English subtitles).

"Festival Express": is a documentary/concert film about three infamous concerts that took place during the summer of 1970. The concerts were held in three large cities across Canada with the star-studded list of performers traveling to each show via a train dubbed the "Festival Express." For the artists, the attraction was the train. It gave them an outlet to cut loose both musically and spiritually. In short, it was one long, rocking party! The film amasses an incredible amount of concert footage (the DVD's two discs are worth every minute) and includes interviews with the talent as well as the promoter of the concert. For me, as a wannabe rock and roll historian, the concert footage (as well as several impromptu train performances) was pure bliss. The Dead singing "Don't Ease Me In;" The Band performing incredible versions of "The Weight" and "I Shall Be Released" (the latter, my personal highlight). Janis Joplin was magnificent (and I've never considered myself a fan), singing;- and I mean SINGING "Cry Baby." Other bands such as The Flying Burrito Bros, Buddy Guy, Sha Na Na, and Delaney & Bonnie & Friends filled out the bill. Unfortunately, the documentary's producers couldn't secure the rights to footage featuring Traffic and Ten Years After. The inclusion of performances by those bands (is there footage of "Low Sparks of High-heeled Boys?") would have sent my joy into overload. Due to legal wrangling, it took the producers over 30 years before they could bring this film to the screen, but I'm certainly glad they succeeded. The documentary's anecdotes were wonderful, as well as the stories behind the protests (the fans believed the concerts should be free, which didn't go over well), and of course, the music was incredible. I wouldn't been able to keep up, but oh to be on that train. Too bad I was just six years-old at the time! *** 1/2 (out of) **** (On DVD).

"Heights": Isabel (Elizabeth Banks) and Jonathan (James Marsden) are a beautiful couple about to marry. She's an ambitious photographer and he's a former model, turned lawyer. For years, Isabel has lived under the shadow of her famous mother - the award-winning actress, Diana Lee (Glenn Close). Unlike her mother, who believes in an open marriage, Isabel is faithful to her man. So faithful that she turns down the job of a lifetime (traveling to Eastern Europe for the New York Times magazine) because it conflicts with her upcoming wedding. Unfortunately, Jonathan is a less-than-honest fiancé, in that hiding his continuing cigarette habit (they're both trying to quit) isn't the only thing he's keeping from her. Diana and her husband's marriage may be open, but that doesn't mean she isn't prone to jealousy and a little tit for tat on the occasions when he disappears for four days only to turn up with a sweet young thing on his lap. Opportunity strikes for Diana when she's smitten by a struggling young actor named Alec (Jesse Bradford). Meanwhile, the story begins to tie together when a journalist (John Light) comes to town to interview the ex-lovers of his boss, a famous photographer who's about to launch an exhibit. The assignment is especially excruciating since the boss is also his current lover. "Heights" was directed and co-written by former Merchant-Ivory associate, Chris Terrio, making his film debut. By nature, the film is very voyeuristic, and like other films about intersecting lives, it's interesting on the surface, but where "Heights" fails is that it forgets to make us want to care about its characters. It's one thing to marvel at the performances (especially Glenn Close's) and play connect-the-dots with what the filmmakers are trying to say, and it's another thing to make you want to care. Ultimately, "Heights" is a very empty film-going experience. ** (out of) ****

"Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room": There's been no shortage of documentaries that depict one side or the other of the political spectrum. Due to the current slant in power, it's mostly a bias towards the progressive, but unless your name is Michael Moore, most of the documentaries fail to gain theatrical distribution and therefore miss their aim. Fortunately, a story as hot as the Enron scandal has broad appeal. Democrats and Republicans can both agree that cheating hard-working people just isn't very nice. The Enron Corporation is (well, was) an energy company based in Houston, Texas. This was a company that grew five-fold in a matter of a few years. That's not unusual for a start-up, but at the time Enron was already a company with a market capitalization in the billions. How did they get that way? That's the controversy. They made much of their revenue from trading futures - energy, bandwidth, the weather (!), whatever they could come up with. And thanks in large part to a very clever CFO (Andy Fastow) they successfully convinced Wall Street as well as dozens of the biggest investment banking names in the universe. They, along with the accounting firm of Arthur Andersen, all jumped on board, eager to lend their reputations and money to what amounted to a grand scheme. Fastow, with the approval of Enron's CEO, Jeffrey Skilling and probably their chairman, Kenneth Lay, convinced a bunch of smart people that Enron could book hypothetical future profits as current profit. And whatever didn't work was shifted as a loss (off Enron's books) to one of Fastow's shell companies. Enron's business was so complicated to understand that the brightest minds in business didn't dare question its legitimacy, and one of the biggest accounting companies in the world had no hesitation when signing off on the numbers. Enron had the business world at their fingertips. At their peak, they had the ability, with little resistance, to call California power plants to request they shut off their power for a few hours (hence, the rolling blackouts). They would then manipulate the markets to charge the state exorbitant fees for electricity. The documentary also more than alleged the "California energy crisis" was a scheme in part to shift the political power of the Democratic-stronghold state from Gray Davis to the Republican's candidate, Arnold Schwarzenegger, which of course, could have more far-reaching ripples. It's damning stuff. "Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room" was written and directed by Alex Gibney, who based his documentary on a book by Fortune magazine contributor, Bethany McLean and her co-author Peter Elkind. Gibney's documentary shows interviews with the authors, as well as former Enron employees. He also had some extraordinary footage of both Bush presidents and their connection to Kenneth Lay; Enron employee meetings, and video and audio tape of executives and traders mocking Enron's manipulative business. "Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room" does no favors for those of the conservative persuasion, but its message is universal. It's a fascinating documentary. *** 1/2 (out of) ****

"Crash": I'd like to think that "Crash" is the prototype for the Hollywood film of the future. Made for less than $7 million and featuring some decently-sized names, it's already a box-office success during a time when studios are struggling to succeed. As you've probably noticed, two or three studios are now required to finance those ambitious $100 million plus period pieces, most of which flop at the box office. Meanwhile, it's the smaller budget films that make the real money. Sure, many of those films are just as inferior as the bloated efforts, but once in a while a movie like "Crash" sneaks through to the cineplex instead of the art house. "Crash" follows two days in the lives of several Los Angeles citizens. We see L.A.'s DA (played by Brendan Fraser) and his socialite wife, Jean (Sandra Bullock), carjacked at gunpoint. The obviously-shaken Jean then makes a mistake in judgment when she immediately distrusts the Hispanic gentleman (Michael Pena) assigned to change the locks on her home. That same gentleman's next assignment is to replace the lock at a convenience store run by an Iranian (Shaun Toub). They differ on why the door won't close, and heated words are exchanged. When the store is vandalized (because the door, not the lock, is broken), the storeowner exacts revenge upon the locksmith. Then there's Anthony (Ludacris) and Peter (Larenz Tate), whose "white man keeping the black man down" exchanges pepper their banter as they move from one carjacking to the next. We also meet Peter's brother, Graham (Don Cheadle), a police detective who can't get any respect from his drug-addicted mother who clearly prefers her always-missing younger son to Graham. Matt Dillon and Ryan Phillippe play L.A. cops with decidedly different opinions about what is, and what isn't proper behavior. The two come to a head when Dillon incorrectly profiles a couple (played by Thandie Newton and Terrence Howard); a confrontation that humiliates the couple and leaves a mark that later plays an important role to the film's continuing arc. I could go on, as the film is thick with characterizations, but what I will tell you is "Crash" is a film about the judgments we all make about other people; from the innocent thoughts to the overt. The film's performances are strong and thoughtful, led by Matt Dillon as the classic bad cop who needs to be studied a little closer, and Thandie Newton, whose fragile psyche isn't helped along by her passive husband. Veteran TV writer, Paul Haggis (who also wrote "Million Dollar Baby") makes his big screen directorial debut, and boy is it impressive. Haggis has been writing sitcom episodes (and created "Walker, Texas Ranger") for thirty years; everything from "Love Boat" to "One Day at a Time." He takes the next big leap in a major way. His film is like a mixture of "Magnolia" and "Traffic," only deeper (if that's possible). He deliberately and very effectively creates an atmosphere of discomfort. Just when you begin to question the intention behind the intention, you realize you've been hooked. My biggest criticism of this film is that the familiar faces are a little too distracting to the story. Sandra Bullock is excellent as the snobby housewife, but I think a lesser known actress would've been just as effective. But perhaps that was Haggis' intention: to point out the negative stereotypes of Hollywood. Hmm. Either way, "Crash" is an enormously interesting, thought-provoking film. ***1/2 (out of) ****

"Mad Hot Ballroom": A documentary about ballroom dancing? Involving New York City school-kids? Yep. And it's good; very good. "Mad Hot Ballroom" follows three schools: P.S.'s 115, 144, and 150 in Washington Heights, Bensonhurst and Tribeca as they prepare for a citywide ballroom dancing competition. About ten years ago, a program was started in New York City to teach ballroom dancing to fifth-graders. It was a mandatory class, which is probably why little wannabe street-toughs suddenly accepted that dancing the Merengue can be a cool thing. The documentary glides effortlessly back and forth between the students, their teachers, and their lives. The cameras catch everyone having real moments. These little 11 year-olds don't have to turn on the charm, it just happens. We watch as these sweet little kids learn how to dance the Fox Trot, Swing, Rumba, Tango, and of course, the Merengue. The teachers and students form a special bond as the children, many from a troubled environment, discover a purpose within dance. The documentary, directed by Marilyn Agrelo with an assist from Amy Sewell (who stumbled upon the great story), raises an interesting question: should these fragile young egos be exposed to tough competition? We never get a yes or no answer. Instead we watch the winners and losers, the teachers who try so hard, and their students who've discovered they can do anything if they want it badly enough. "Mad Hot Ballroom" is a lovingly-created, well-paced and well-edited documentary with charm and innocence to spare. To say this is a great feel-good film would be a huge understatement. T-A-N-G-O! ***1/2 (out of) ****

"The Interpreter": As you might suspect (from the heading at the top of this page), I'm a great admirer of both Sean Penn and Nicole Kidman. They're great actors who work well inside, as well as outside the Hollywood system. Occasionally, both actors will "take the paycheck;" make a big Hollywood film for a big salary that "allows" them to take a big pay-cut down the road for that small independent film with the great script and "important" director. Penn and Kidman are together for the first time in the $80 million production of "The Interpreter," the story of Silvia Broome (Nicole Kidman), a United Nations interpreter who accidentally overhears a plot to assassinate a dictator who happens to be scheduled to address the UN. Penn plays Tobin Keller, a secret service agent assigned to protect the leader but not necessarily Broome, who also happens to have an agenda against the dictator. Keller doubts Broome's story that she "happened" to be in the room at the same time two people who happen to speak her rare language (Ku, a fictitious language for the made-up African country of Matobo) were plotting a murder. Uh-huh. I wish I could say the rest of the film was interesting, but, well, it was just a mixture of half-baked intrigue, and subplots involving Broome and Keller's various personality issues. And the characters' motives were silly and the ending unsatisfying. "The Interpreter" was directed by Sydney Pollack (who also has a small role as Penn's boss) and written by a total of five people (two story, three screenplay) which is bad sign number one (yep, overstuffed screenplay). The end result is a pointless film with a brooding Sean Penn and pouting Nicole Kidman, all dressed up with nowhere to go. ** (out of) ****

"Look At Me": was a darling at last year's Cannes Film Festival, winning best screenplay and scoring a nomination for best picture. After watching it, I understood why. Lolita Cassard (Marilou Berry), all of twenty years, is a talented classical singer living in the shadow of her famous father, Etienne Cassard (Jean-Pierre Bacri), a once-successful author and current book publisher. All Lolita wants is a little attention. Her horribly self-absorbed father barely notices her; her youngish stepmother (played by Virginie Desarnauts) means well, but she's too pretty and too thin to ever put the spotlight on Lolita. Lolita's male friends seem more interested in working with her father than becoming romantically involved with "Daddy's big girl." Even her singing teacher (Agnes Jaoui, who also directed "Look At Me" and co-wrote the screenplay with Bacri) tries to use the Etienne connection to get her husband, Pierre (Laurent Grevill), a small-time author, noticed. But then there's Sebastien (Keine Bouhiza), the young man Lolita meets by accident after she's inadvertently ditched by her father and stepmom. Sebastien seems to have her best interests at heart, but she treats him as if he's just another user. The strength of "Look At Me" lies in its script. Jaoui and Bacri do an excellent job of infusing social satire (even poking fun at their country-folk) with social commentary. Their character development is brilliant and reiterates to us why the French are almost always ahead of the curve when it comes to making great films. Agnes Jaoui ("The Taste of Others") lows keys it in her acting role as the singing teacher with the not-so-hidden agenda, but comes out to the forefront as director. She does a terrific job of balancing the film's multiple character and storylines as well as delivering the message of "Look At Me," which is, well, right there if only you'd see it. ***1/2 (out of) **** (In French with English subtitles).

"Millions": Damian (Alexander Nathan Etal) is a typical seven year-old boy. Well, if typical is having an encyclopedic knowledge of saints. The ancient saints come to him in his daydreams and he addresses them almost matter-of-factly, as if they pop in on him all the time. And he always asks them about St. Maureen, hoping that Maureen, his mother who left his world when he was very, very little, has achieved official sainthood. One day, while playing in his makeshift clubhouse and chatting up a saint, a bag of money literally drops in on him. Damian, ever the kind-hearted soul, sees the money as a message to help the unfortunate. His nine year-old brother Anthony (Lewis Owen McGibbon), a budding capitalist to Damian's socialist, would rather use the money to buy property and worldly goods. The two boys, growing up in England around the turn of the new century, agree it would be best if their father (played by James Nesbitt) didn't know about the money. Their plans are complicated by the fact that the pounds are about to become worthless if they're not converted over to the new Euro, and that converting more than a few thousand pounds at a time (they have over 200,000) will raise suspicion. And naturally, reality sets in when the real owners of the money (well, the crooks who stole it, then threw it from a train) start looking for their ill-gotten gains. "Millions" was directed by Danny Boyle ("Trainspotting") and written by Frank Cottrell Boyce ("Hilary and Jackie"). Their previous work doesn't suggest they're capable of making a charming children's story, but, well, they surprised us. "Millions" hooks us with its sweet nature, led by the performance of its lead, Alexander Nathan Etal, whose heart makes you wish he'd somehow grow up to be Prime Minister. "Millions" also scores an extra half-point for NOT having a predictable ending. Boyce's story was headed down a particular road, but thankfully it was steered on the right course. "Millions" is one of those feel-good, word-of-mouth films that don't come along nearly often enough. It might be a tough find in the theaters, but it's definitely worth a rental when it comes out on DVD. *** 1/2 (out of) ****

"Sin City": "…and now for a bit of the ol' ultra-violence." Alas, Alex never saw it quite this "good." Violence in film has been celebrated for years, from smeared grapefruits to .44 Magnums. Writer-director (and jack of all trades), Robert Rodriguez's latest film, "Sin City" just happens to be a little more conspicuous and a lot louder than most of the previous examples. "Sin City" is based on a series of graphic novels by Frank Miller, who also receives a co-director and writing credit for this film. "Sin City" takes place in the fictional black and white town of Basin City, a sort of warped version of Gotham City, only instead of Chief O'Hara and Commissioner Gordon, we're treated to the corrupt cop Jackie Boy (played by an unrecognizable Benicio Del Toro) and crooked Senator Roark (Powers Boothe), the latter not so forgiving that his rapist son (played by Nick Stahl) has been disfigured by a vigilante cop played by Bruce Willis. Hartigan, the cop, was trying to save a very young girl from rape. Hartigan winds up in jail for the crime he didn't commit, while the girl disappears. Upon his release, Hartigan unwittingly leads the bad guys to the girl (now played by Jessica Alba), leading to more blood and violence. The film's two other stories involve a part-man, part-beast (played by Mickey Rourke) out for the revenge after the mysterious murder of the woman he thinks he loves, and Clive Owen as a wanted man who is trying to protect the hooker community who are struggling to keep a truce in place after the murder of the aforementioned Jackie Boy. "Sin City" isn't an easy film to watch, especially if you loathe violence. For me, it's harder to ignore the impressiveness of this film. Robert Rodriguez's direction cannot be dismissed. He faithfully translates Frank Miller's stories to screen, which by the way, in spite of the heavy violence, are pretty enthralling. The look of the film (black and white with splashes of red and yellow) is stunning, and the performances, when taken in the context that they're translations of comic book characters, are excellent. "Sin City" is a wild orgy of unrelenting violence. If you're not opposed to a very well-made film that "celebrates" this style, then "Sin City" is for you. ***1/2 (out of) ****

"Vera Drake": Mike Leigh has amassed an impressive number of films and plays, as well as a reputation as a meticulous director and one who does not work with a script. Instead, his actors rehearse for several weeks, sometimes months, before filming. During the course of the rehearsals, they improvise dialogue and flesh out their characters. As I watched his latest film, "Vera Drake," I thought for certain he'd broken from this tradition, that there was no way he could've operated without a script. Lo and behold, not only did Leigh not use a script, but his characters - with the exception of his lead - didn't even know the central theme of the film's story. They learned when their characters learned. Wow. Vera Drake (Imelda Staunton) is a well-liked domestic for several well-to-do London, England families. Vera is a hard worker who is loved by her family and well-respected within the community. She's been married for several years to Stan (Phil Davis) who together with his brother, runs an auto repair shop. Together, they have two young adult children: Sid (Daniel Mays) and Ethel (Alex Kelly). Vera, blessed with a huge heart, is always helping someone, whether it's the sick and ill, or a young woman in trouble. It's the latter that gets Vera in hot water with the law. You see, sweet Vera, in one of her ways of helping, performs abortions. In England in 1950 (the setting of this film), that's illegal. Vera's tight-knit family is stunned, and in some cases, hugely disappointed, even though Vera never does it for money. It's her "friend" Lily (Ruth Sheen) who finds the young women and, unknown to Vera, collects the money.

Mike Leigh is in a bit of a precarious position. He could take an obvious side to the abortion issue. He could quote the bible, or preach of human rights, but wisely, he chooses to let the viewer be the judge. The result is a well-balanced film, showing both sides of the spectrum, allowing people with opposite views to not feel too slighted that the film is biased one way or the other. Leigh paints Vera as a good person who, despite her good intentions, must accept the consequences of her actions. This is Mike Leigh's project, but clearly, this is Imelda Staunton's film. She gives a performance for the ages. We watch in amazement as this beautiful person's smile slowly wavers, but her spirit is never crushed. She is at peace with herself, and we believe every moment of it. Staunton is very nicely supported by the tight cast, including Phil Davis as her rock of a husband, as well as fine performances from Daniel Mays as her confused son and Eddie Marson as Reg, a bachelor who is courting Vera's daughter and who seems destined to repeat the family cycle of big hearts. Like its namesake, "Vera Drake" is simple, but powerful. This is a great film. **** (out of) **** (On DVD)

"Up and Down": Human smugglers; petty thieves; a very dysfunctional family; a couple who desperately want to have a baby; a subculture built upon fanaticism and lined with racism. That's the setup of "Up and Down." Oh, and somehow it all comes together. "Up and Down" begins with a baby. The aforementioned smugglers are stuck with an infant, left behind after a drop. Without revealing too much of the film's story, the baby winds up with the couple who are unable to have children and cannot adopt, mainly because the husband (or boyfriend, we're not sure) has a record and despite his good intentions, is having problems trying to "clean up." Meanwhile, Martin (Petr Forman) is in the Czech Republic to reluctantly visit his dying father (Jan Triska); the same father who left his mother for Martin's girlfriend some twenty years earlier. Yep, that's dysfunction. And as I mentioned, the characters, some good, some bad, all tie together in the end. "Up and Down" was co-written and directed by Jan Hrebejk ("Divided We Fall"). His film doesn't have a conventional story, nor is it always capable of keeping what it has together, but it has things to say, plus a very likeable heart. And it doesn't always provide solutions, preferring to leave it to the viewer. But that, unlike most films, makes you think about the things it has to say. "Up and Down" runs a long, but ultimately rewarding 108 minutes. ***1/2 (out of) **** (In Czech with English subtitles)

"Downfall": A 155 minute film about Hitler. Joy. Actually, yes, it should be celebrated. "Downfall" is a thoroughly fascinating study of Adolf Hitler's final days. The film, written by Bernd Eichinger and directed by Oliver Hirschbiegel, begins inside Hitler's bunker in April, 1945, during the last days before the famed icon for the Nazi party took his own life. It is apparent to most of the Nazis that Berlin cannot be held. Hitler, however, still believes he can win the war, and as the title of this film suggests, this would be his downfall. Hitler and many of his leaders, as well as their staffs and families, are holed up in a bunker in Berlin, plotting their next move. Once in a while, the cameras take us outside to the horrors of war, to show us the atrocities; some subtle, some not, and then go back inside, to show us, one by one, the dominos, as they begin to fall. Oliver Hirschbiegel's direction is calm and deliberate. He shows us the madness of the Nazis, their discipline, and the lengths they will go to ensure they never subject themselves to anything that contradicts their beliefs. He delivers us its characters and leaves it to us to decide if they are worthy of respect or condemnation. And Hirschbiegel's direction does something most filmmakers wouldn't dare: he puts a human face on the Nazi Party; to show us that like us, they're flesh and bone. The film is based on two stories: Joachim Fest's "Inside Hitler's Bunker," and the memoirs of Hitler's personal secretary, Traudl Junge (played by Alexandra Maria Lara in this film). The story, amazingly, captures our attention for the whole of its running time. That alone, is an amazing accomplishment. And at the center of it all is Adolf Hitler (Bruno Ganz). It would be easy to reduce this person, this blight in human history, to a stereotypical assault. Instead, Ganz weaves himself inside his character, showing us the human side as well as the monster. He BECOMES Adolf Hitler. It is a performance for the ages. "Downfall" is a film that takes you into the bunker; to act as witness to the deeds of some of the most horrific minds in history. "Downfall" is a completely riveting, remarkable film that deserves to be remembered as one of the greatest celluloid depictions of war. **** (out of) **** (In German with English subtitles)

"Kung Fu Hustle": I'm learning fast that "kung fu" films can be very hit and miss. I loved "Crouching Tiger" and the "Kill Bill" series. "Hero" was a very likeable film, but others of its type (like "House of Flying Daggers") were difficult to handle. Popular in Asia doesn't always translate to good in America. Unfortunately, the latest flavor among the geek-boy set (in addition to "Oldboy," which I've yet to see) is "Kung Fu Hustle." The film has collected a number of prizes, including best picture at the Hong Kong film awards. Unlike recent Chinese films that have taken themselves too seriously, "Kung Fu Hustle," like its title suggests, takes tradition and flings it out the window. Think Bruce Lee meets Jackie Chan meets Popeye, and you'll get the idea. The film is set in China in the 30's when gangsters ruled the streets, and if you didn't know how to take care of yourself, you learned. Sing (Stephen Chow, who also wrote and directed this film) and his unnamed sidekick (Chi Chung Lam) desperately want to impress the notorious Axe Gang. Unfortunately, their idea of an impression is attempting to thug and con a small community known as "Pig Sty Alley." As I mentioned earlier, in this era you learned how to take care of yourself, which Sing and his sidekick learned of this town very fast. The film's lack of plot is replaced by a lot of violence - and not just for violence's sake, but to amuse. Yes, the shtick of "Kung Fu Hustle" is cartoon violence. Y'know, the kind with frying pans and anvils and chain-smoking overweight housewives with rollers in their hair and running shoes on their feet. In other words, the silliest of all kinds. I watched "Kung Fu Hustle" with an audience more accustomed to the latest effort from Merchant-Ivory, and like them (from what I heard), I was little shocked by this film. Not because it was trying to shock (it wasn't), but because it was pretty bad. Cartoon violence can be funny because it's in cartoon form. When it's not, it generally ceases to be funny. Unfortunately, the filmmakers behind "Kung Fu Hustle" (the same behind "Shaolin Soccer") never learned that lesson. * 1/2 (out of) **** (In Cantonese and Mandarin with English subtitles)

"Winter Solstice": "The birth of the unconquered sun" is the Roman definition of "winter solstice." If you're looking for a connection (aside from the last name of the primary characters), well, Jim Winters (Anthony LaPaglia) has two sons: Gabe (Aaron Stanford) and Pete (Mark Webber), both brooding and very self-involved and not at all sympathetic to their widower father. And they're both looking to take flight. Jim runs a landscaping business in a small town in New Jersey. Gabe, the oldest son, works as a clerk at a local produce market, but longs to escape the thing that is posing as his life. 17 year-old Pete is a directionless youth who is spending a chunk of his vacation attending summer school - for the second time. A house-sitting neighbor (played by Alison Janney) offers a glimmer of romance for Jim, who has never quite let go of his wife who died tragically five years earlier. The boys rarely speak of her, though it's clear the remaining parts of the Winters' household are sorely missing their beating heart. What I have just told you is more than I knew one hour into this film. "Winter Solstice" tell you almost nothing. The dialogue is sparse, leaving you to figure out the film. The characters show little more than facial expressions, yet this film's restraint is almost a joy to behold. This small American independent film celebrates the minimalism of some of its foreign counterparts, eschewing the directness of 99% of films on this part of the globe. Josh Sternfeld wrote and directed "Winter Solstice" with a slow and steady hand, economically expressing his ideas, and drawing out some subtle, but nuanced performances from his minor stars. Anthony LaPaglia is wonderful as the father, while Aaron Stanford and Mark Webber slowly, but effectively release their angst. Alison Janney, as usual, is a breath of fresh air, while Ron Livington (as one of Pete's teachers) and Michelle Monaghan (as Gabe's girlfriend) are nice in supporting roles. "Winter Solstice" demonstrates that sometimes silence IS golden. ***1/2 (out of) ****

"Walk on Water": Lior Ashkenazi plays Eyal, an assassin for Mossad, Israel's version of the CIA. Eyal's boss, Menachem (Gidon Shemer), has a penchant for catching Nazi war criminals and will stop at almost nothing to eradicate the world of any that are still alive, vowing to "get them before God does." Among the most notorious still at-large, is Alfred Himmelman. Mossad intelligence "lost" him about two months earlier. Menachem isn't sure if he's even alive, but when he learns Himmelman's two adult grandchildren are in Tel Aviv, he sends Eyal undercover as a tour guide, hoping the grandchildren will somehow provide some clues. What keeps "Walks on Water" interesting is the relationships that develop between the ultra-serious Eyal and the children -- an openly gay man (played by Knut Berger) and his attractive sister, Pia (Caroline Peters). Added to the twist are Eyal's personal problems, and the common bonds of the three characters in spite of their very different backgrounds. However, the film suffers from the director's (Eytan Fox) continuous insistence on using water as a motif. After about the eighth time, we got it. This seems minor, but it's a distraction that keeps us from becoming completely absorbed by the strong story. The performances are solid, but fairly low-key. Where the film partially succeeds is in its sense of suspense, creating several tense and very effective moments. But where it also fails is in the silly ending, which is a little too convenient and very reminiscent of a typical Hollywood film. "Walk on Water" is an interesting, but flawed film. ** 1/2 (out of) **** (In Hebrew and German with English subtitles)

"The Motorcycle Diaries": A handful of years before Ernesto "Che" Guevara, along with Fidel Castro, reshaped Cuba, Che was simply Ernesto, a pleasant medical student with a big heart and a sense of adventure. Ernesto (Gael Garcia Bernal), along with his best friend, Alberto (Rodrigo de la Serna) and their beat-up motorcycle, set off to explore South America, with the goal to complete their 8000 mile trip before Alberto reaches his 30th birthday (less than a year away). Both men were raised in a comfortable environment in Argentina, but it isn't long before they connect with the people they meet on their journey. Ernesto, in particular, sees himself as "one of them," even to the point where he seems entirely comfortable treating the less fortunate inhabitants of a leper colony. The film only hints at the future, and surprisingly the "Che" we see in this film seems far removed from the Che the rest of the world would soon know. "The Motorcycle Diaries" was directed by Walter Salles and adapted by Jose Rivera (from books written by both Ernesto and Alberto). Salles, best known for "Central Station," does an incredible job of balancing story and characters, scenery and mood. "The Motorcycle Diaries" is also a magnificent feast for the eyes (it was photographed by Eric Gautier), and very well-acted by its two principal actors. Gael Garcia Bernal, who has incredible taste in film roles, is as usual, fantastic, while Rodrigo de la Serna, playing the lively Ernesto, gives a performance that almost steals the film from Garcia Bernal. Salles' "The Motorcycle Diaries" is a beautiful and very thought-provoking film. *** 1/2 (out of) **** (On DVD)

"Ray": Ray Charles Robinson grew up in rural North Florida with his single mother and toddler brother, George. A tragic accident cost George his life, haunting Ray and possibly contributing to his blindness, which occurred just a short time after the accident. From that point forward, Ray has to overcome one obstacle after the other (many of his own making) as he went from talented blind musician, to great musician who happened to be blind. The film traces Ray's musical beginnings, from his first big break in Seattle (he traveled there by bus from Florida in the late-Forties) to his rise as an influential musician. Taylor Hackford, who directed "Ray" and wrote the outline for the film (James L. White received screenplay credit), pulls few punches in his depiction of Charles' life. Ray was a fantastic musician, but he was a philanderer, a drug addict, a poor husband, and not a particularly good father. Still, Hackford, while not glossing over the sordid stuff, shows the man's greatness, and the viewer in return, accords the subject with the proper respect. We marvel at the beauty of the music that Charles' created, but we're not asked to overlook the man's errors. It is as much a film about a man and his demons as it is about a man and his music. In my opinion, this is what separates it from most biographies. As Ray Charles, Jamie Foxx is sensational. No, 'sensational' is too soft. How about 'masterful'? Yeah, that gives the performance a little more justice. In short, Foxx *IS* Ray. He's supported nicely by Kerry Washington as Della Bea, Ray's all-too-supportive wife, as well as a host of character actors, including the return (for me) of the great Curtis Armstrong, who manages to keep a straight face as Ahmet Ertegun, one of the founders of Atlantic Records, as well as one of the key people behind the scenes of Ray's career. The biopic drags a little, but since it only covered a portion of Charles' life, it could've been longer. Still, it's a fascinating story, smartly told, and filled with fantastic music. *** 1/2 (out of) **** (On DVD)

"The Wild Parrots of Telegraph Hill": No, this isn't a film about crazed birds. Rather, it's a documentary about a frequently displayed man (Mark Bittner) who has come to care for a group of wild parrots. The documentary is set in the Telegraph Hill portion of San Francisco. Bittner, an unemployed musician in his early fifties, is able to gain a temporary place to stay in the unused cottage behind the property of a friend. It's there where he spends most of his time communicating with and feeding the parrots. Bittner, under the watchful eye of filmmaker Judy Irving, narrates "Wild Parrots," almost justifying his unusual behavior, though it doesn't take long for the viewer to wish they were right there to experience it firsthand. Bittner, in fact, reaches the point where he becomes a bit of a local legend (he's dubbed "The Birdman of Telegraph Hill"). "Wild Parrots" is a documentary, so the ironies aren't scripted (but can be carefully edited), but one cannot help but marvel at the common threads man has with nature; how it never gets too old to be reminded we are one. The documentary fondly quotes beat author Gary Snider: "If you're looking for nature, look at where you are." How true. "The Wild Parrots of Telegraph Hill" is a sweet and sometimes very touching film. There are only a couple of prints out there, so you may have to wait a while for it to come to your city. *** (out of) ****

"The Assassination of Richard Nixon": There is a moment in Niel Mueller's "The Assassination of Richard Nixon" where one of the characters draws a parallel between his personal situation and how Richard Nixon was initially elected because he promised 200 million Americans he would end the war in Vietnam. He also pointed out that Nixon used the same promise in 1972 while seeking re-election. Americans were too wrapped up in their own worlds and a little too trusting to notice how some people will say and do anything to get what they want. Sean Penn plays Sam Bicke, a man who has grown to loathe such people. Unfortunately, he's a salesman with a boss (played by Jack Thompson) who expects him to do whatever it takes to sell office furniture. Sam has been bouncing around from job to job and really needs to succeed at this latest one. He's trying to reconcile with his estranged wife, Marie (Naomi Watts) and two young daughters (whom he's lucky to see once a week). Marie knows their marriage is over, but Sam still has hope. Don Cheadle is Bonny, Sam's only friend. Together, they hope to form a successful business partnership, something Bonny, a black man in the early-'70s, cannot manage alone. Sam hopes their concept of a tire delivery business will be his ticket out of the rat race that is slowly eating him alive. He applies for a small business loan, but can't be patient with the long bureaucratic process he is forced to endure. So when things start to fall apart, Sam's falls apart. Richard Nixon seems to symbolize what is wrong in Sam's world. Nixon and his Watergate troubles are constantly playing in the background; at the office, in Sam's apartment, everywhere. Nixon is the TV that Sam wants to kick in. The title of this film is misleading to a degree (and sadly, seems to be the primary basis for some of the criticisms of this film), but to a larger degree, it is entirely appropriate. "The Assassination of Richard Nixon" was written and directed by Niel Mueller, but this film belongs to Sean Penn. He is stunning as Sam Bicke. As brilliant as he was in "Mystic River" and "21 Grams" (and in many other films), Sam Bicke may be his greatest performance. I'm a little biased, but I believe Sean Penn has just confirmed what I've known for years--that he's our greatest living actor. Penn is supported nicely by Don Cheadle, Naomi Watts and Jack Thompson, but they are clearly secondary players. Penn doesn't have to stretch an inch to play Bicke. He IS Sam Bicke. There are obvious parallels between this character and De Niro's portrayal of Travis Bickle in "Taxi Driver" but I view Penn's character as a little more personal. Ironically, Mueller appeared to direct this film as an homage to "Taxi Driver," as well as to 70's films, in general. Unfortunately, while the film made a bit of a splash at Cannes, it has gone almost unrecognized in the States and has been ignored during awards season. It's a shame that Sean Penn failed to receive an Oscar nomination. It makes me wonder if this film was made during the wrong decade. Somehow, had it been made thirty years ago (or shortly after the actual events took place) with the same principle players (not possible, of course), I believe it would've stood handsomely among the classic films of that period. **** (out of) ****

"Bad Education": Writer-director Pedro Almodovar is no stranger to controversy. His films about alternative lifestyles have shocked and delighted audiences for years. So why not add the Catholic church to the unhappy side of the ledger? Gael Garcia Bernal ("The Crime of Father Amaro"), also not a stranger to upsetting the Catholic church, is, well, a few different characters in "Bad Education," Almodovar's tale of confusing love among actors, priests, and filmmakers. "Bad Education" is one of those films where the less you know, the better, which works for me because to describe it in detail would give far too much away. Let's just say it involves an actor (Garcia Bernal), a filmmaker (Fele Martinez) and a priest (Daniel Gimenez Cacho and Luis Homar). There's also blackmail, an identity crisis, and lots of sex. And now you know too much. As for whether or not I'd recommend the film, I would have to say it helps to be a fan of Almodovar's past work (especially "All About My Mother" and "Tie Me Up! Tie Me Down!"). If you are, you'll probably like "Bad Education," but will agree it isn't Almodovar's best work. *** (out of) **** (In Spanish with English subtitles)

"Before Sunset": Like most filmgoers, I have a few genres of films that I tend to avoid like the plague. With very few exceptions, I stay away from the Hollywood cookie-cutter films. I usually ignore the sequels, remakes, film versions of rehashed TV shows, and I avoid watching "chick flicks." This is probably why I never saw "Before Sunrise" and why it's taken me several months (and the DVD release) to see its sequel, "Before Sunset." I know, shame on me. Writer-director Richard Linklater, with help from his stars Julie Delpy and Ethan Hawke, crafted this lovely film about a man and a woman reuniting after not seeing each other for nine years. Hawke is Jesse, who has written a book about his brief encounter with Celine (Delpy); an encounter that took place nine years ago in Vienna. He "happens" to be in Paris to promote the book, and Celine, who lives within walking distance of a bookstore where Jesse happens to be conducting a book-signing, "happens" to show up. Celine and Jesse were supposed to meet again in Vienna six months later, but circumstances intervened. Nine years later, Jesse is unhappily married to the wrong woman, but feels blessed to have a beautiful child. Celine is in a committed relationship, but secretly she, like Jesse, wonders what might've happened had they kept that meeting. Jesse only has a few more hours in Paris, so he, along with Celine, discuss their lives and dreams while wandering the streets of her Paris neighborhood. True, I don't like "chick flicks," but I have a soft spot for beautiful love stories. This film's dilemma reminded me of Bill Murray and Scarlett Johansson's situation in "Lost in Translation." They feel they're perfect for one another; they WANT to be together but they…can't. Julie Delpy and Ethan Hawke are perfect as Celine and Jesse. Linklater, who allowed his stars to write most of their dialogue, wisely stepped aside and let his actors do their jobs. "Before Sunset" is a very, very sweet film. If there's ever a "Before the Next Sunrise," I promise to see it during its opening weekend. ***1/2(out of) **** (On DVD).

"Maria Full of Grace": Maria (Catalina Sandino Moreno) isn't happy with her life. The 17-year-old works the assembly line at a rose factory, preparing roses for packages of dozens, something she'll never receive from her loser of a boyfriend. The job, which pays little but includes plenty of verbal abuse, helps provide for her older sister (who couldn't be bothered to look for work) and mother. She sweats, yet gets nowhere. Life in Columbia is no bed of, well, you get the idea. Push finally comes to shove when she learns she's pregnant. She can't stand her job and doesn't want the baby's father to raise her child, so she bolts for Bogota where a job as a mule awaits her. A mule is a person willing to smuggle baggies of drugs inside their stomach. Maria sees the money and the potential opportunity to improve her life, and ignores the obvious risks. That's the setup for writer-director Joshua Marston's first film, which is so simple and plainly-stated, it's almost perfect. "Maria Full of Grace" doesn't preach, flash guns, or ask for pity. It just works. Catalina Sandino Moreno just received a richly-deserved Oscar nomination for her role of Maria, the sweet, but tough girl who isn't quite sure what she wants out of life. She's supported nicely by Yenny Paola Vega as her best friend (and fellow mule), Blanca, and Guilied Lopez as Lucy, also a mule--and the person who changes Maria's life. At times, "Maria Full of Grace" plays like an "After School Special" for the 21st century, only the total result is so much better. ***1/2 (out of) **** (Mostly in Spanish with English subtitles). (On DVD).

"Million Dollar Baby": As a child, one of my favorite films was "Tarantula," the scary tale of an oversized spider that lived in a cave. It was standard Saturday afternoon fare, but I always caught it whenever it was shown on TV. I didn't find out until years later that "Tarantula" (released in 1955) was one of actor Clint Eastwood's earliest films. Fifty years later, he's still making "great" films. "Million Dollar Baby" is the 25th film in 33 years for the director side of Eastwood's personality, and when all is said and done, it could wind up as his best. Eastwood plays Frankie Dunn, a hardened ex-cut-man, who now trains up-and-coming boxers at the gym he runs along with ex-fighter Eddie Dupris (Morgan Freeman). Frankie still has a lot to give to the fight game, but his very deliberate, cautious ways don't mesh with his boxers' aggressive approaches to their careers. Thus, he often finds himself left waiting at the boxing altar, while a more daring manager takes the fighter to the title bout. Maggie Fitzgerald (Hilary Swank) is a 31-year-old waitress with an uncommon dream to succeed as a female boxer. She's been small-timing it for a while and is now ready to take the next step. Almost inexplicably, she sees something in the cantankerous Frankie. She believes he can train her to become the best female boxer in the world. It's too bad that Frankie isn't interested in training women. Still, she's paid up for six months, so he allows her to go through the boxing motions within the confines of his gym. Eventually, with the help of Eddie, Maggie is able to convince Frankie to represent her. He agrees to train her until she's able to find a real manager. Well, you can figure out the rest. The difference is that "Million Dollar Baby" is really two films. The first is about boxing, while the second is about father-daughter relationships. Both films work - well. Eastwood, working from a script by Paul Haggis (based on a series of short stories by an ex-boxer), burrows deep inside his characters, telling us that Frankie is wounded by his damaged relationship with his daughter, while the carefree Maggie is in denial about her own dysfunctional family. It isn't hard to figure out that Frankie is exactly who Maggie needs and vice versa. This is handled perfectly, and is the main reason why this film succeeds. The work by the principle actors: Clint Eastwood, Hilary Swank and Morgan Freeman, is touching and effective. The story is extremely well-written and the direction is methodical. It's easy to see why so much praise has been heaped upon this film. "Million Dollar Baby" is a magnificent piece of work. **** (out of) ****

"In Good Company": I've been a staunch critic of the "Hollywood system" for a very long time. If it works, make a sequel. If it once worked on some level, whether it's an old film, comic book, TV show, foreign film, video game, theme-park ride, whatever - make it into a film. This leaves very little room for anything remotely displaying originality, or at the very least, something fresh. On that note, it's very, very, VERY refreshing to watch a nice Hollywood film like "In Good Company." It doesn't try to beat you over the head with a certain value system or a pat ending. Instead it just delivers a likeable story with good actors. What a concept. Dan Foreman (Dennis Quaid) can't complain much. He's 51, and married with two teenage daughters, including Alex (Scarlett Johansson), who's about to start her first semester at NYU. He's also a successful ad sales manager for a large magazine. And Dan's wife (played by Marg Helgenberger) has just announced she's pregnant again for the first time in nearly fifteen years. Life is a little stressful on the pocketbook, but is otherwise pretty good. Well, until Dan's employer (Sports America - a knockoff of Sports Illustrated) is sucked up by a large conglomerate. Suddenly Dan is out as manager, replaced by a man half his age. That man, Carter Duryea (Topher Grace), is a comer who is content to ride the company ladder at the expense of everything and everyone, including his new co-workers and his young marriage. He is consumed by the bottom line, and is very married to his work. Fortunately, Dan is allowed to stay on at the magazine, but his role has been reduced to that of Carter's "wing man." And to make matters even more humiliating, Dan's daughter Alex has started dating Carter. Ouch. Yes, on the surface, "In Good Company" would seem like just another soap opera, but fortunately it's not. Writer-director Paul Weitz ("About a Boy") has taken a fairly simple story and turned it into a very likeable film about three good people (Quaid, Grace and Johansson) whose lives are intertwined a little more than they expected. The key to all this is Grace's character. It would be very easy to create a sleazy, step-on-people-as-you-rise-to-the-top personality, but Carter Duryea is actually a sweet guy with all the right intentions, but with the wrong aim. It's a beautifully-written character capped off by an excellent performance from Topher Grace (best known for "That 70's Show"). His star is clearly on the rise. Dennis Quaid, the all-Hollywood good guy, is rock-solid as the hard working family man, and the lovely Scarlett Johansson just keeps getting better. Once upon a time, Hollywood used to make films like "In Good Company." Using today's formula, here's hoping this film makes a bundle. I think the "system" could use a few more films like this one. ***1/2 (out of) ****

"The Merchant of Venice": I can't say I'm an expert on William Shakespeare. My exposure to Shakespeare has been limited to film adaptations of his work. Thus, I have a lot to learn. From what I do know, "The Merchant of Venice" is considered the most "problematic" of his plays. It is rife with anti-semitism and homoerotic undertones; certainly controversial enough to keep it from ever being faithfully produced as a film - until now. Writer-director Michael Radford ("Il Postino") took Shakespeare's work and instead of whitewashing it or stripping it down, changed almost nothing (this is according to a guest speaker [and Shakespeare expert] at the screening I attended), choosing to remain faithful to the Bard's original vision, controversy and all. In 16th century Venice, Italy, Jews are forbidden from owning any property, so Shylock (Al Pacino) earns his living as a moneylender. The very-Christian Antonio (Jeremy Irons) loathes Jews, especially Shylock, but is forced to deal with the lender as an indirect by-product of wanting to show his devotion to the young lord Bassanio (Joseph Fiennes), who is more interested in getting the attention of the beautiful Portia (Lynn Collins).

Michael Radford understands that today's society (for the most part) is intelligent enough to understand that yesterday's naïve norms, if accurately placed in context, can be construed in the right manner. Feeling this, Radford freely flaunts both the anti-semitism of Shakespeare's story, as well as that "The Merchant of Venice" is actually ABOUT anti-semitism, which is a pretty progressive angle for an over 400-year-old story. Radford's adaptation was very honest in its use of stereotypes as well as for its sensitivities and insensitivities, also faithfully portraying the Venice environment where Jews who ventured outside their 'geto' had to identify themselves by wearing red hats, and that the common prostitute had to bear their breasts in order to identify their gender. In its heart, "The Merchant of Venice" is a deep and very rich love story, showing the lengths to which human beings will go to express their love for another. Al Pacino was brilliantly understated (thank goodness!) as Shylock, who as revenge for being spat upon and cursed by Antonio (among other personal transgressions) wouldn't settle for anything less than a pound of flesh as repayment for their arrangement. Jeremy Irons as the jaded sea merchant Antonio was marvelous in a performance that was also quite understated (another reason to like Radford's direction), while Fiennes, in not the juiciest role, was quite good as Bassanio, who was so taken by Portia to notice what was right in front of him. My favorite performance was from Lynn Collins as the aforementioned Portia. I'd never heard of her ("13 Going On 30" was her previous largest role) but what a revelation. The Julliard-trained actress certainly proved her acting chops with this role. She will be heard from again. The main plaudits belong to Michael Radford, who not only took this "problematic play" and made it work; he also extracted some beautifully-tempered performances from his actors, especially the normally over-the-top Pacino. You don't have to be a fan of the Bard to appreciate great filmmaking, and in this regard, Radford's adaptation of Shakespeare's "The Merchant of Venice" certainly qualifies.**** (out of) ****

"Hotel Rwanda": Paul Rusesabagina (Don Cheadle) runs a nice hotel in Rwanda, once a very popular vacation spot in Africa. Paul is a man who feels that everyone and everything has a price. If he needs a favor, or influence, or just wants someone to remember him someday, he'll slip him money, or an expensive bottle of Scotch; whatever it takes. In Paul's case, eventually he'll be bargaining with his life, as well as the lives of his family and closest friends. You see, Paul is a Hutu living in a society that's divided in two. If you're from Rwanda, you're either a Tutsi or a Hutu. And it's the Hutus that wield the power (once controlled by the Tutsis) and have the will to destroy the Tutsi culture. Paul doesn't openly approve of these feelings; in fact he's married to Tatiana (Sophie Okonedo), a Tutsi. Eventually, push comes to shove and political unrest erupts in Rwanda. If you're a Tutsi it is no longer safe to be in Rwanda. For Paul, he's torn because in his heart he's a Tutsi, but he knows that his savvy nature and his Hutu background will buy time for his wife and her family. So he stays, using his large hotel to house not only his family and closest friends, but about one thousand Tutsis, all of whom fear for their lives, knowing that their fellow Tutsis are lying dead in their streets, victims of a mass extermination by the Hutus. Paul, a man consumed by power and greed, is now using his heart to guide him to do the right thing. Unfortunately, even the presence of the United Nations (led by Colonel Oliver, played by Nick Nolte) cannot control what is turning into a horrific genocide of the Tutsis. "Hotel Rwanda" is the story of a courageous man who is led to do the right thing. It's also a powerful history lesson. Don Cheadle as Paul Rusesabagina, is brilliant. "Hotel Rwanda" as a story (directed and co-written by Terry George), is troubling, but you still won't be able to take your eyes off the screen. *** 1/2 (out of) ****

"House of Flying Daggers": During the last five years, we've been treated to a succession of excellent-to-great films out of Hong Kong; most with stories that celebrated China's rich history. In that vein we have "House of Flying Daggers." And the question is: should we treat this film as one trying to soak itself in the grand traditions of Hong Kong cinema, or should it be judged for what it is? I say the latter, and on that note, I don't believe I've ever watched a more strikingly beautiful, more promising film than what I witnessed during the first 70 minutes or so of "Flying Daggers." The story was really starting to take and the twists were making sense. But what followed over the last 45 minutes was almost laughably bad. "House of Flying Daggers" takes place late in the 9th century, during China's Tang Dynasty. One of China's most notorious political guerrilla groups, "The Flying Daggers," has just lost its leader to an assassination. The government would love to know the group's successor so it can kill him too. Captain Jin (Takeshi Kaneshiro) tracks the former leader's blind daughter (played by Ziyi Zhang) to a brothel. Long story short, he decides to allow her to lead him to the Dagger's leader by pretending to save her life. This act gains her trust and leads to the young couple falling in love. Awww. Everything works - from the incredibly well-choreographed action sequences, to the lush beauty of the landscape, to the story. And then writer-director Zhang Yimou (fresh from "Hero") decided to go to the well not once too often, but about, oh, a dozen times. It's one thing to have a twist or two to keep things interesting, but Yimou didn't know when to stop pulling off the proverbial mask to reveal yet another mask. It didn't help when the film melted into a silly soap opera, causing my eyes to drift towards the CG effects. How come those leaves aren't moving when the horse trots by? Can it really snow two feet in an hour or two? Wait a minute. They're still fighting after an hour or two? Shouldn't they pass out from exhaustion and blood loss? Wait a minute--wasn't that person fatally wounded hours ago? Why are they now moving? I would expect this from a "B" movie on late night cable, but not from a Zhang Yimou film. Needless to say, I was incredibly disappointed, especially after such a stellar beginning. And now that your expectations have been tempered, perhaps you'll enjoy "House of Flying Daggers." I wish I did. * 1/2 (out of) **** (In Mandarin with English subtitles).

"The Aviator": Eccentric billionaire recluse. Skirt-chaser. Obsessive-compulsive. Genius. These are words that could describe the enigma that is Howard Hughes. Director Martin Scorsese explores the man in depth in "The Aviator." Well, the depth extends to about a twenty year period of Hughes' life, beginning in the mid-20's with his move to Hollywood, and ending after World War 2 with his attack upon Pan Am's dominance of the airline industry. Hughes (played by Leonardo DiCaprio) inherited his father's machine tool company and the all the riches that allowed him to pursue his primary dreams: the conquering of Hollywood and its various starlets, and aviation. You might say he was a spoiled rich kid, but he also had talent. The man was a visionary who designed planes, personally broke aviation speed and distance records, co-directed the ground-breaking film "Hell's Angels," and built up his father modest empire through RKO, TWA and Hughes Aircraft, amassing an amazing fortune. Scorsese, directing a script by John Logan ("The Last Samurai," "The Gladiator") takes us through Hughes' various successes as well as his failures, and shows Hughes the control freak, as well as Hughes' gentle side (mainly explored through his relationship with Katherine Hepburn). My chief criticism of "The Aviator" is that it's too focused on a narrow period in Hughes' life, and places too much emphasis on his quirks, and less on the positive aspects to his personality. And at nearly three hours, one would think there was plenty of time to explore more than just his various neuroses. Still, having said all that, what Scorsese did show us was still a very interesting dollop of Hughes' life. The film is also a technical marvel, from Scorsese's precise direction to his tremendous attention to the detail of the period. Leonardo DiCaprio, whom I didn't think I would buy as Hughes, was outstanding. The film also benefited from strong performances from Cate Blanchett as Hughes' great love, Katherine Hepburn; Alan Alda as a witch-hunting senator; John C. Reilly as Hughes' right-hand man, and Alec Baldwin as Juan Trippe, the head of Pan Am and Hughes' biggest business rival. For what Scorsese gave us, "The Aviator" is an outstanding achievement. For what he could've given us, well, I guess we'll just have to wonder. *** (out of) ****


 

Go to Roy's Movie Page

INDEX to Roy's Movie Pages and Reviews

Return to Roy's World Home Page